Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANZCX vs MCOAX
ANZCX vs MCOAX Comparison
Open Charts ANZCX vs MCOAX
NYLI MacKay Convertible
Price$19.84
Change-$0.08 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.56B
ANZCX vs MCOAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANZCX vs. MCOAX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANZCX is a Hold and MCOAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCOAX has more cash in the bank: 1.56B vs. ANZCX (1.34B). MCOAX pays higher dividends than ANZCX: MCOAX (3.01) vs ANZCX (1.24). ANZCX was incepted earlier than MCOAX: ANZCX (15 years) vs MCOAX (31 years). ANZCX (1.84) is less costly to investors than MCOAX (0.94). ANZCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 152.00 vs. MCOAX (35.00). ANZCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCOAX: ANZCX (2500) vs MCOAX (15000). ANZCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.78 vs. MCOAX (11.33). ANZCX return over 5 years is better than : 9.50 vs. MCOAX (5.73).
| ANZCX | MCOAX | ANZCX / MCOAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.94 | 184% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.94 | 196% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.570 | 7.072 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 15000 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 25000 | - |
| Net Assets | 1.34B | 1.56B | 86% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 3.01 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.78 | 11.33 | 184% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.66 | 17.65 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.50 | 5.73 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.99 | 36.97 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement