Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANZCX vs MCOAX
ANZCX vs MCOAX Comparison
Open Charts ANZCX vs MCOAX
NYLI MacKay Convertible
Price$20.60
Change+$0.07 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.62B
ANZCX vs MCOAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANZCX vs. MCOAX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANZCX is a Hold and MCOAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCOAX has more cash in the bank: 1.62B vs. ANZCX (1.39B). MCOAX pays higher dividends than ANZCX: MCOAX (2.96) vs ANZCX (1.20). ANZCX was incepted earlier than MCOAX: ANZCX (15 years) vs MCOAX (31 years). ANZCX (1.84) is less costly to investors than MCOAX (0.94). ANZCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 152.00 vs. MCOAX (35.00). ANZCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCOAX: ANZCX (2500) vs MCOAX (15000). ANZCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.36 vs. MCOAX (12.83). ANZCX return over 5 years is better than : 12.34 vs. MCOAX (10.85).
| ANZCX | MCOAX | ANZCX / MCOAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.94 | 184% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.94 | 196% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.040 | 11.174 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 15000 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 25000 | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 1.62B | 86% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 2.96 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.36 | 12.83 | 182% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.64 | 20.46 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.34 | 10.85 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.11 | 46.18 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement