Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANZCX vs MCOAX
ANZCX vs MCOAX Comparison
Open Charts ANZCX vs MCOAX
ANZCX vs MCOAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANZCX vs. MCOAX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANZCX is a Hold and MCOAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCOAX has more cash in the bank: 1.89B vs. ANZCX (1.71B). MCOAX pays higher dividends than ANZCX: MCOAX (2.01) vs ANZCX (0.40). ANZCX was incepted earlier than MCOAX: ANZCX (16 years) vs MCOAX (31 years). ANZCX (1.83) is less costly to investors than MCOAX (0.93). ANZCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 159.00 vs. MCOAX (40.00). ANZCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCOAX: ANZCX (2500) vs MCOAX (15000). ANZCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.04 vs. MCOAX (25.69). ANZCX (10.53) and MCOAX (10.43) have equivalent 5 years return.
| ANZCX | MCOAX | ANZCX / MCOAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.93 | 186% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.93 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.089 | 20.331 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 15000 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 25000 | - |
| Net Assets | 1.71B | 1.89B | 90% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 2.01 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.04 | 25.69 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.28 | 44.45 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.53 | 10.43 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.03 | 81.06 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement