Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANZCX vs PACIX
ANZCX vs PACIX Comparison
Open Charts ANZCX vs PACIX
ANZCX vs PACIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANZCX vs. PACIX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANZCX is a Hold and PACIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACIX has more cash in the bank: 1.86B vs. ANZCX (1.71B). PACIX pays higher dividends than ANZCX: PACIX (1.22) vs ANZCX (0.40). ANZCX was incepted earlier than PACIX: ANZCX (16 years) vs PACIX (39 years). ANZCX (1.83) is less costly to investors than PACIX (1.15). PACIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 212.00 vs. ANZCX (159.00). PACIX has a lower initial minimum investment than ANZCX: PACIX (2000) vs ANZCX (2500). PACIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.01 vs. ANZCX (30.04). PACIX return over 5 years is better than : 19.47 vs. ANZCX (10.53).
| ANZCX | PACIX | ANZCX / PACIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 1.08 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 1.15 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.089 | 23.185 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 1.71B | 1.86B | 92% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 1.22 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.04 | 42.01 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.28 | 67.70 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.53 | 19.47 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.03 | 131.67 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement