Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AOFAX vs WCMLX
AOFAX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts AOFAX vs WCMLX
Alger Small Cap Focus A
Price$20.05
Change+$0.47 (+2.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets825.82M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.15
Change+$0.06 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.26M
AOFAX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AOFAX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOFAX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AOFAX has more cash in the bank: 826M vs. WCMLX (41.3M). AOFAX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . AOFAX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: AOFAX (18 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than AOFAX (1.22). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. AOFAX (60.23). AOFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: AOFAX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). AOFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.51 vs. WCMLX (-3.04). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -0.83 vs. AOFAX (-31.23).
| AOFAX | WCMLX | AOFAX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.99 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.79 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.051 | 1.788 | 3% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 826M | 41.3M | 2,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.51 | -3.04 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.84 | 21.43 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.23 | -0.83 | 3,747% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.32 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement