Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AOFAX vs WCMLX
AOFAX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts AOFAX vs WCMLX
Alger Small Cap Focus A
Price$18.20
Change-$0.05 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets863.34M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$12.85
Change-$0.07 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.34M
AOFAX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AOFAX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jul 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOFAX is a Hold and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AOFAX has more cash in the bank: 863M vs. WCMLX (43.3M). AOFAX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . AOFAX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: AOFAX (17 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than AOFAX (1.22). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. AOFAX (60.23). AOFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: AOFAX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). AOFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.00 vs. WCMLX (-0.77). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 20.77 vs. AOFAX (-29.48).
| AOFAX | WCMLX | AOFAX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.99 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.79 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.001 | -0.078 | 9,003% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 863M | 43.3M | 1,993% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.00 | -0.77 | -518% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.98 | 21.57 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.48 | 20.77 | -142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.84 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement