Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AOFAX vs WCMLX
AOFAX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts AOFAX vs WCMLX
AOFAX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AOFAX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOFAX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AOFAX has more cash in the bank: 788M vs. WCMLX (47.2M). AOFAX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . AOFAX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: AOFAX (19 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than AOFAX (1.30). WCMLX (89.00) and AOFAX (88.45) have comparable annual turnover. AOFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: AOFAX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). AOFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.73 vs. WCMLX (2.81). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -7.51 vs. AOFAX (-26.15).
| AOFAX | WCMLX | AOFAX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.99 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.79 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.958 | 3.852 | 362% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 788M | 47.2M | 1,669% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.73 | 2.81 | 632% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.94 | 23.40 | 213% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.15 | -7.51 | 348% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.50 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement