Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AOFCX vs NRGSX
AOFCX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts AOFCX vs NRGSX
Alger Small Cap Focus C
Price$17.60
Change-$0.24 (-1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets884.61M
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$62.80
Change+$0.25 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.71B
AOFCX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AOFCX vs. NRGSX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOFCX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.71B vs. AOFCX (885M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than AOFCX: NRGSX (0.06) vs AOFCX (0.00). AOFCX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: AOFCX (18 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). AOFCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). AOFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.23 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than AOFCX: NRGSX (0) vs AOFCX (1000). AOFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.73 vs. NRGSX (-10.12). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : -2.32 vs. AOFCX (-30.30).
| AOFCX | NRGSX | AOFCX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.74 | 262% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.74 | 262% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.513 | -3.902 | -116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 885M | 8.71B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.06 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.73 | -10.12 | -96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.35 | 5.90 | 446% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.30 | -2.32 | 1,305% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.49 | 10.24 | 757% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement