Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AOTAX vs RNWHX
AOTAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts AOTAX vs RNWHX
AOTAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AOTAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOTAX is a Hold and RNWHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. AOTAX (224M). AOTAX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: AOTAX (2.27) vs RNWHX (1.15). AOTAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: AOTAX (20 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). AOTAX (1.50) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). AOTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 146.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than AOTAX: RNWHX (250) vs AOTAX (2500). AOTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.26 vs. RNWHX (21.04). AOTAX return over 5 years is better than : 48.15 vs. RNWHX (16.46).
| AOTAX | RNWHX | AOTAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.72 | 179% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.72 | 208% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.270 | 16.415 | 197% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 224M | 88.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.27 | 1.15 | 198% |
| Returns for 1 year | 50.26 | 21.04 | 239% |
| Returns for 3 years | 92.26 | 52.01 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.15 | 16.46 | 292% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.33 | 107.75 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers