APA vs MGY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APA is a Hold and MGY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMGY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- APA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- APA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MGY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
APA (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -7.96% price change this week, while MGY (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -9.67% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +45.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.04%.
Reported Earning Dates
APA is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.
MGY is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Production (+45.78% weekly)The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.
| APA | MGY | APA / MGY | |
| Capitalization | 10.7B | 4.73B | 226% |
| EBITDA | 4.75B | 875M | 543% |
| Gain YTD | -39.347 | 9.849 | -400% |
| P/E Ratio | 3.83 | 12.84 | 30% |
| Revenue | 8.28B | 1.23B | 675% |
| Total Cash | 87M | 401M | 22% |
| Total Debt | 5.3B | 393M | 1,350% |
APA | MGY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 52 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 30 Undervalued | 46 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 27 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 15 | 44 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 16 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
APA's Valuation (30) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as MGY (46). This means that APA’s stock grew similarly to MGY’s over the last 12 months.
MGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is significantly better than the same rating for APA (100). This means that MGY’s stock grew significantly faster than APA’s over the last 12 months.
APA's SMR Rating (15) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as MGY (44). This means that APA’s stock grew similarly to MGY’s over the last 12 months.
MGY's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as APA (64). This means that MGY’s stock grew similarly to APA’s over the last 12 months.
MGY's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is significantly better than the same rating for APA (95). This means that MGY’s stock grew significantly faster than APA’s over the last 12 months.
| APA | MGY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 74% | about 1 month ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 76% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| XLK | 235.96 | 3.47 | +1.49% |
| The Technology Select Sector SPDR® ETF | |||
| XVV | 45.69 | 0.43 | +0.94% |
| iShares® ESG Screened S&P 500 ETF | |||
| PXE | 28.30 | 0.21 | +0.75% |
| Invesco Energy Exploration & Prod ETF | |||
| SYLD | 68.27 | 0.30 | +0.45% |
| Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF | |||
| OVM | 21.97 | 0.02 | +0.09% |
| Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF | |||
APA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APA has been closely correlated with MTDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APA jumps, then MTDR could also see price increases.
MGY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGY has been closely correlated with MTDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MGY jumps, then MTDR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MGY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MGY | 100% | -1.08% | ||
| MTDR - MGY | 87% Closely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| NOG - MGY | 86% Closely correlated | -1.25% | ||
| MUR - MGY | 84% Closely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| CHRD - MGY | 84% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| OVV - MGY | 83% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
More | ||||