APAM
Price
$41.06
Change
-$0.23 (-0.56%)
Updated
Nov 19, 01:29 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.91B
76 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
BEN
Price
$21.44
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.17B
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

APAM vs BEN

Header iconAPAM vs BEN Comparison
Open Charts APAM vs BENBanner chart's image
Artisan Partners Asset Management
Price$41.06
Change-$0.23 (-0.56%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.91B
Franklin Resources
Price$21.44
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$106.51K
Capitalization11.17B
APAM vs BEN Comparison Chart in %
APAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BEN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APAM vs. BEN commentary
Nov 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APAM is a Hold and BEN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 19, 2025
Stock price -- (APAM: $41.29 vs. BEN: $21.44)
Brand notoriety: APAM and BEN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APAM: 89% vs. BEN: 118%
Market capitalization -- APAM: $2.91B vs. BEN: $11.17B
APAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.91B. BEN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $11.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $158.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APAM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBEN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • APAM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BEN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, APAM is a better buy in the long-term than BEN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APAM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BEN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APAM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BEN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, APAM is a better buy in the short-term than BEN.

Price Growth

APAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а -6.74% price change this week, while BEN (@Investment Managers) price change was -6.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

APAM is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2026.

BEN is expected to report earnings on Feb 02, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.65% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BEN($11.2B) has a higher market cap than APAM($2.91B). BEN has higher P/E ratio than APAM: BEN (23.56) vs APAM (11.13). BEN YTD gains are higher at: 10.448 vs. APAM (4.109). BEN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.13B vs. APAM (473M). APAM has less debt than BEN: APAM (295M) vs BEN (13.2B). BEN has higher revenues than APAM: BEN (8.64B) vs APAM (1.16B).
APAMBENAPAM / BEN
Capitalization2.91B11.2B26%
EBITDA473M1.13B42%
Gain YTD4.10910.44839%
P/E Ratio11.1323.5647%
Revenue1.16B8.64B13%
Total CashN/A276M-
Total Debt295M13.2B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APAM vs BEN: Fundamental Ratings
APAM
BEN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1275
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5682
SMR RATING
1..100
1786
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6059
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5949
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

APAM's Valuation (9) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BEN (12). This means that APAM’s stock grew similarly to BEN’s over the last 12 months.

APAM's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BEN (82). This means that APAM’s stock grew similarly to BEN’s over the last 12 months.

APAM's SMR Rating (17) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for BEN (86). This means that APAM’s stock grew significantly faster than BEN’s over the last 12 months.

BEN's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as APAM (60). This means that BEN’s stock grew similarly to APAM’s over the last 12 months.

BEN's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as APAM (59). This means that BEN’s stock grew similarly to APAM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APAMBEN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BEN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BUSA34.610.07
+0.21%
Brandes U.S. Value ETF
HFSI35.60-0.01
-0.01%
Hartford Strategic Income ETF
HFXI31.51-0.34
-1.06%
NYLI FTSE International Eq Ccy Netrl ETF
COPP28.21-0.34
-1.20%
Sprott Copper Miners ETF
MULL62.40-7.90
-11.24%
GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF

APAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APAM has been closely correlated with TROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APAM jumps, then TROW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APAM
1D Price
Change %
APAM100%
+0.44%
TROW - APAM
79%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
BEN - APAM
74%
Closely correlated
-0.56%
JHG - APAM
73%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
SEIC - APAM
73%
Closely correlated
-0.69%
CNS - APAM
72%
Closely correlated
-0.74%
More