It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APAM’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSAMG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APAM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAMG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
APAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а +3.47% price change this week, while SAMG (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.38% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.10%.
APAM is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.
SAMG is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.
Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
APAM | SAMG | APAM / SAMG | |
Capitalization | 3.16B | 143M | 2,208% |
EBITDA | 402M | 23.9M | 1,682% |
Gain YTD | -13.529 | -17.453 | 78% |
P/E Ratio | 14.26 | 15.74 | 91% |
Revenue | 975M | 117M | 833% |
Total Cash | 178M | 70.3M | 253% |
Total Debt | 313M | 29.3M | 1,068% |
APAM | SAMG | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 10 Undervalued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 33 | 35 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 16 | 62 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 46 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
APAM's Valuation (10) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAMG (68) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that APAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAMG’s over the last 12 months.
APAM's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as SAMG (35) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that APAM’s stock grew similarly to SAMG’s over the last 12 months.
APAM's SMR Rating (16) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAMG (62) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that APAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAMG’s over the last 12 months.
SAMG's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as APAM (77) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that SAMG’s stock grew similarly to APAM’s over the last 12 months.
SAMG's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as APAM (78) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that SAMG’s stock grew similarly to APAM’s over the last 12 months.
APAM | SAMG | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago70% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago71% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago75% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago72% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago65% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago63% | 2 days ago64% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 3 days ago70% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago69% | 8 days ago62% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago74% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago59% | 2 days ago63% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
ACGLX | 19.58 | N/A | N/A |
Invesco Growth and Income R | |||
LVOYX | 17.48 | N/A | N/A |
Lord Abbett Value Opportunities I | |||
AIWEX | 13.35 | N/A | N/A |
Cavanal Hill World Energy Institutional | |||
CCGIX | 23.07 | N/A | N/A |
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth Instl | |||
FCIAX | 52.82 | N/A | N/A |
American Funds Invmt Co of Amer 529-F-2 |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APAM has been closely correlated with TROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APAM jumps, then TROW could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To APAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
APAM | 100% | +1.55% | ||
TROW - APAM | 76% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
VRTS - APAM | 75% Closely correlated | +2.33% | ||
BN - APAM | 74% Closely correlated | +1.90% | ||
CNS - APAM | 73% Closely correlated | -0.09% | ||
SEIC - APAM | 72% Closely correlated | +1.53% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAMG has been loosely correlated with CNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SAMG jumps, then CNS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAMG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SAMG | 100% | -1.19% | ||
CNS - SAMG | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
APAM - SAMG | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.55% | ||
BBUC - SAMG | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
STT - SAMG | 44% Loosely correlated | +2.00% | ||
BN - SAMG | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.90% | ||
More |