Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
APDMX vs FSMAX
APDMX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts APDMX vs FSMAX
APDMX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
APDMX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APDMX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. APDMX (3.19B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than APDMX: FSMAX (0.50) vs APDMX (0.00). APDMX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: APDMX (11 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). APDMX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). APDMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.54 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than APDMX: FSMAX (0) vs APDMX (250000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. APDMX (-9.51). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. APDMX (-37.08).
| APDMX | FSMAX | APDMX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.04 | 3,057% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.04 | 3,057% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.215 | 13.370 | 9% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.19B | 40.1B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.51 | 20.57 | -46% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.18 | 55.83 | -4% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.08 | 33.18 | -112% |
| Returns for 10 years | -15.88 | 133.82 | -12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement