Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
APFDX vs RSLAX
APFDX vs RSLAX Comparison
Open Charts APFDX vs RSLAX
APFDX vs RSLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
APFDX vs. RSLAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APFDX is a Hold and RSLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLAX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. APFDX (116M). RSLAX pays higher dividends than APFDX: RSLAX (0.21) vs APFDX (0.00). APFDX was incepted earlier than RSLAX: APFDX (9 years) vs RSLAX (24 years). RSLAX (1.74) is less costly to investors than APFDX (1.44). APFDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.34 vs. RSLAX (41.00). RSLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than APFDX: RSLAX (250) vs APFDX (1000). RSLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.98 vs. APFDX (-3.44). APFDX return over 5 years is better than : -5.39 vs. RSLAX (-6.60).
| APFDX | RSLAX | APFDX / RSLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 1.74 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.74 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.277 | 16.432 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 116M | 91.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.44 | 21.98 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.15 | 38.67 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.39 | -6.60 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 83.31 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement