Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
APFDX vs RSLAX
APFDX vs RSLAX Comparison
Open Charts APFDX vs RSLAX
APFDX vs RSLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
APFDX vs. RSLAX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APFDX is a Buy and RSLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLAX has more cash in the bank: 88.9B vs. APFDX (116M). RSLAX pays higher dividends than APFDX: RSLAX (0.21) vs APFDX (0.00). APFDX was incepted earlier than RSLAX: APFDX (9 years) vs RSLAX (24 years). RSLAX (1.74) is less costly to investors than APFDX (1.44). APFDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.34 vs. RSLAX (41.00). RSLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than APFDX: RSLAX (250) vs APFDX (1000). RSLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.70 vs. APFDX (-5.61). APFDX return over 5 years is better than : -4.69 vs. RSLAX (-8.40).
| APFDX | RSLAX | APFDX / RSLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 1.74 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.74 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.427 | 11.740 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 116M | 88.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.61 | 18.70 | -30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.17 | 33.39 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.69 | -8.40 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 68.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement