Advertisement
APG vs PWR
Which Stock Would AI Choose? APi Group Corporation (APG) vs. Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both APG and PWR stocks operate in the Industrials sector's Engineering & Construction industry, riding infrastructure and electrification trends.
- PWR boasts superior year-to-date gains of 49.56% versus APG's 27.29%, with a much larger market cap of $94.7 billion compared to $21.0 billion.
- Recent market activity shows both near 52-week highs, with APG hitting an all-time high around $49.46 and PWR at $630.94, ahead of Q1 2026 earnings on April 30.
- PWR exhibits stronger one-year returns around 117-132%, outperforming APG's 95-111%.
- Analyst sentiment favors PWR with recent price target hikes, like Citi's to $733, amid robust backlogs.
Introduction
This stock comparison pits APG against PWR, two leaders in the Engineering & Construction segment of Industrials. Both benefit from heightened demand for infrastructure services, driven by electrification, renewables, and government spending. Traders seeking momentum plays and investors eyeing sector growth will find value in analyzing their relative performance, market positioning, and catalysts. With recent highs and upcoming earnings, this head-to-head highlights trade-offs in scale, growth trajectories, and sentiment shifts in the current market environment.
APG Overview and Recent Performance
APi Group Corporation (APG) provides safety, specialty, and infrastructure services, including inspection, monitoring, and repair across North America and beyond. In recent weeks, APG stock has shown resilience, reaching an all-time high near $49.46 amid positive 2026 guidance projecting adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) of $1.14-1.20 billion, implying a 13.8% margin. Trading at around $48.70 with a market cap of $21.0 billion, it delivered 27.29% YTD and 95.53% over one year, outperforming the S&P 500. Sentiment has been buoyed by strong free cash flow, an active M&A (mergers and acquisitions) pipeline, and healthy backlogs, though high trailing P/E (price-to-earnings ratio) of 125.36 reflects growth expectations ahead of Q1 2026 earnings.
PWR Overview and Recent Performance
Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) delivers infrastructure solutions for electric power, renewable energy, and communications networks globally. Recent market activity has propelled PWR near its 52-week high of $640.61, closing at $630.94 despite minor pullbacks, fueled by a massive backlog and upbeat Q1 outlook. Year-to-date gains stand at 49.56%, with one-year returns exceeding 117%, far surpassing benchmarks. Trading with a $94.7 billion market cap, P/E of 92.65, and analyst upgrades like Citi's $733 target, performance reflects robust revenue growth to $28.48 billion TTM (trailing twelve months) and demand in utilities. Q1 2026 earnings loom, with expected EPS (earnings per share) of $2.04.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from over 350 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies. Only about 25 make the cut, selected by AI analysis for suitability in current market conditions like volatility and sector trends. These include Signal Agents for short-term signals, Virtual Agents for simulated portfolios, and Brokerage Agents for live execution, spanning timeframes from intraday to long-term, with varying win rates, profit factors, and average gains tailored to technical or fundamental approaches. This dynamic list helps traders identify high-potential bots amid evolving conditions. Explore Trending AI Robots to find tools matching your style.
Head-to-Head Comparison
APG focuses on safety and specialty services with niche expertise, while PWR emphasizes large-scale infrastructure for utilities and renewables, giving it broader exposure to energy transition megatrends. Growth drivers align on infrastructure spending, but PWR's scale yields higher organic revenue growth and a deeper backlog. Recent momentum favors PWR with superior YTD and one-year returns, though both show trend consistency near highs. Risk factors include elevated valuations (high P/E ratios) and project delays; PWR faces more cyclical utility risks, while APG leverages M&A for diversification. Market sentiment tilts toward PWR via analyst targets, but APG offers relative value in stability.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward PWR based on stronger trend consistency, YTD outperformance, larger scale, and positive catalysts like backlog growth and analyst upgrades. While APG maintains solid positioning with upbeat guidance, PWR's relative momentum and sector tailwinds suggest higher probability of near-term upside in the current environment.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APG is a Hold and PWR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePWR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- APG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PWR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- APG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- PWR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
APG (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +0.72% price change this week, while PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -6.98% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -3.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.00%.
Reported Earning Dates
APG is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
PWR is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (-3.23% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| APG | PWR | APG / PWR | |
| Capitalization | 18.2B | 100B | 18% |
| EBITDA | 902M | 2.71B | 33% |
| Gain YTD | 9.723 | 58.441 | 17% |
| P/E Ratio | 125.36 | 98.77 | 127% |
| Revenue | 8.17B | 30.1B | 27% |
| Total Cash | 645M | 250M | 258% |
| Total Debt | 3.07B | 6.32B | 49% |
APG | PWR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 86 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 4 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 63 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 15 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
APG's Valuation (88) in the null industry is in the same range as PWR (89) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that APG’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as APG (10) in the null industry. This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to APG’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's SMR Rating (63) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as APG (94) in the null industry. This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to APG’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as APG (50) in the null industry. This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to APG’s over the last 12 months.
APG's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as PWR (15) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that APG’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
| APG | PWR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 71% | 5 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 63% |
Advertisement
APG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APG has been loosely correlated with IESC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if APG jumps, then IESC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To APG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| APG | 100% | +0.48% | ||
| IESC - APG | 52% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| FIX - APG | 52% Loosely correlated | -6.64% | ||
| MTZ - APG | 48% Loosely correlated | -4.40% | ||
| STRL - APG | 47% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| PWR - APG | 45% Loosely correlated | -3.34% | ||
More | ||||
PWR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWR has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWR jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PWR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PWR | 100% | -3.34% | ||
| MTZ - PWR | 81% Closely correlated | -4.40% | ||
| MYRG - PWR | 79% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| FIX - PWR | 76% Closely correlated | -6.64% | ||
| EME - PWR | 68% Closely correlated | -3.69% | ||
| IESC - PWR | 68% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||