APG
Price
$34.41
Change
-$0.08 (-0.23%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
14.29B
19 days until earnings call
PWR
Price
$383.78
Change
+$3.69 (+0.97%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
56.88B
19 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

APG vs PWR

Header iconAPG vs PWR Comparison
Open Charts APG vs PWRBanner chart's image
APi Group
Price$34.41
Change-$0.08 (-0.23%)
Volume$1.4M
Capitalization14.29B
Quanta Services
Price$383.78
Change+$3.69 (+0.97%)
Volume$906.75K
Capitalization56.88B
APG vs PWR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
APG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PWR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APG vs. PWR commentary
Jul 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APG is a StrongBuy and PWR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 12, 2025
Stock price -- (APG: $34.41 vs. PWR: $383.78)
Brand notoriety: APG and PWR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APG: 35% vs. PWR: 84%
Market capitalization -- APG: $14.29B vs. PWR: $56.88B
APG [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $14.29B. PWR’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $56.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePWR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • APG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PWR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PWR is a better buy in the long-term than APG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APG’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APG’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PWR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PWR is a better buy in the short-term than APG.

Price Growth

APG (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +0.23% price change this week, while PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -0.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +29.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +302.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

APG is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

PWR is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+0.31% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PWR($56.9B) has a higher market cap than APG($14.3B). APG has higher P/E ratio than PWR: APG (84.61) vs PWR (61.90). APG YTD gains are higher at: 43.495 vs. PWR (21.547). PWR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.25B vs. APG (776M). APG has less debt than PWR: APG (3.04B) vs PWR (4.75B). PWR has higher revenues than APG: PWR (24.9B) vs APG (7.14B).
APGPWRAPG / PWR
Capitalization14.3B56.9B25%
EBITDA776M2.25B34%
Gain YTD43.49521.547202%
P/E Ratio84.6161.90137%
Revenue7.14B24.9B29%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt3.04B4.75B64%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APG vs PWR: Fundamental Ratings
APG
PWR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3079
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
99
SMR RATING
1..100
8257
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
396
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2428
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PWR's Valuation (93) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as APG (94) in the null industry. This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to APG’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as APG (9) in the null industry. This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to APG’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's SMR Rating (57) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as APG (82) in the null industry. This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to APG’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's Price Growth Rating (6) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APG (39) in the null industry. This means that PWR’s stock grew somewhat faster than APG’s over the last 12 months.

APG's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as PWR (28) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that APG’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APGPWR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PWR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NUSA23.23-0.01
-0.05%
Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year US Aggt Bd ETF
MMTM267.15-1.21
-0.45%
SPDR® S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF
BUFI37.68-0.19
-0.49%
AB International Buffer ETF
IXP110.00-0.60
-0.54%
iShares Global Comm Services ETF
XMHQ99.47-1.15
-1.14%
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF

APG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APG has been closely correlated with EME. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APG jumps, then EME could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APG
1D Price
Change %
APG100%
-0.55%
EME - APG
67%
Closely correlated
+1.21%
FIX - APG
66%
Closely correlated
+1.07%
ACM - APG
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
MYRG - APG
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.63%
MTZ - APG
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
More

PWR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWR has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWR jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PWR
1D Price
Change %
PWR100%
+0.97%
MTZ - PWR
84%
Closely correlated
+0.87%
PRIM - PWR
82%
Closely correlated
+1.87%
EME - PWR
82%
Closely correlated
+1.21%
STRL - PWR
79%
Closely correlated
+2.31%
MYRG - PWR
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.63%
More