Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
APGAX vs CGFAX
APGAX vs CGFAX Comparison
Open Charts APGAX vs CGFAX
APGAX vs CGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
APGAX vs. CGFAX commentary
Jul 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APGAX is a Buy and CGFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. APGAX (22.6B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than APGAX: CGFAX (0.23) vs APGAX (0.00). APGAX was incepted earlier than CGFAX: APGAX (34 years) vs CGFAX (24 years). APGAX (0.80) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. APGAX (25.00). APGAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CGFAX (4%) vs CGFAX (4%). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than APGAX: CGFAX (250) vs APGAX (2500). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.31 vs. APGAX (-2.18). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.48 vs. APGAX (14.26).
| APGAX | CGFAX | APGAX / CGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.62 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.62 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.028 | 7.542 | 40% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 121% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.6B | 361B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.18 | 5.31 | -41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.35 | 44.58 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.26 | 15.48 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 163.98 | 111.28 | 147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers