Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
APGAX vs RGACX
APGAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts APGAX vs RGACX
APGAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
APGAX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APGAX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. APGAX (20.7B). APGAX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . APGAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: APGAX (34 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than APGAX (0.80). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. APGAX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than APGAX: RGACX (250) vs APGAX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.53 vs. APGAX (-8.34). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 10.82 vs. APGAX (8.58).
| APGAX | RGACX | APGAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.93 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.93 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.560 | 8.819 | 18% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.7B | 353B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.34 | -0.53 | 1,570% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.51 | 40.68 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.58 | 10.82 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 156.64 | 101.31 | 155% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement