Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
APGRX vs RSLAX
APGRX vs RSLAX Comparison
Open Charts APGRX vs RSLAX
APGRX vs RSLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
APGRX vs. RSLAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APGRX is a Buy and RSLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLAX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. APGRX (129M). RSLAX pays higher dividends than APGRX: RSLAX (0.21) vs APGRX (0.00). APGRX was incepted earlier than RSLAX: APGRX (13 years) vs RSLAX (24 years). RSLAX (1.74) is less costly to investors than APGRX (1.28). RSLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. APGRX (38.00). RSLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than APGRX: RSLAX (250) vs APGRX (1000000). APGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.06 vs. RSLAX (21.98). APGRX return over 5 years is better than : 24.07 vs. RSLAX (-6.60).
| APGRX | RSLAX | APGRX / RSLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.74 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.74 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.425 | 16.432 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 129M | 91.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.06 | 21.98 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.81 | 38.67 | 165% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.07 | -6.60 | -365% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.58 | 83.31 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement