Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
APGZX vs GFACX
APGZX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts APGZX vs GFACX
AB Large Cap Growth Z
Price$122.84
Change-$0.38 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.67B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.70
Change-$0.13 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.91B
APGZX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
APGZX vs. GFACX commentary
Sep 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APGZX is a Buy and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. APGZX (27.7B). APGZX pays higher dividends than GFACX: APGZX (0.08) vs GFACX (0.00). APGZX was incepted earlier than GFACX: APGZX (10 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than APGZX (0.51). APGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than APGZX: GFACX (250) vs APGZX (2000000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.58 vs. APGZX (12.25). APGZX return over 5 years is better than : 64.38 vs. GFACX (39.11).
| APGZX | GFACX | APGZX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.36 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.36 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.398 | 17.158 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 250 | 800,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.7B | 336B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.08 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.25 | 15.58 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.82 | 53.17 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.38 | 39.11 | 165% |
| Returns for 10 years | 193.61 | 82.02 | 236% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement