Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
APGZX vs GFACX
APGZX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts APGZX vs GFACX
APGZX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
APGZX vs. GFACX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APGZX is a Buy and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. APGZX (20.7B). APGZX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . APGZX was incepted earlier than GFACX: APGZX (11 years) vs GFACX (26 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than APGZX (0.50). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. APGZX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than APGZX: GFACX (250) vs APGZX (2000000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.39 vs. APGZX (-6.76). APGZX return over 5 years is better than : 14.03 vs. GFACX (3.85).
| APGZX | GFACX | APGZX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 1.35 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 1.35 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.799 | 8.529 | 21% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 250 | 800,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.7B | 353B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.76 | -2.39 | 283% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.87 | 34.46 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.03 | 3.85 | 364% |
| Returns for 10 years | 178.65 | 82.33 | 217% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement