Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
APGZX vs RGAFX
APGZX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts APGZX vs RGAFX
APGZX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
APGZX vs. RGAFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APGZX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. APGZX (20.7B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than APGZX: RGAFX (0.46) vs APGZX (0.00). APGZX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: APGZX (11 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). APGZX (0.50) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. APGZX (25.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than APGZX: RGAFX (250) vs APGZX (2000000). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.42 vs. APGZX (-6.76). RGAFX (14.74) and APGZX (14.03) have equivalent 5 years return.
| APGZX | RGAFX | APGZX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.34 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.34 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.799 | 9.276 | 19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 250 | 800,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.7B | 353B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.76 | 0.42 | -1,616% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.87 | 44.36 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.03 | 14.74 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 178.65 | 109.80 | 163% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers