Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
APHDX vs RSLAX
APHDX vs RSLAX Comparison
Open Charts APHDX vs RSLAX
APHDX vs RSLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
APHDX vs. RSLAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APHDX is a Buy and RSLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLAX has more cash in the bank: 88.9B vs. APHDX (116M). RSLAX pays higher dividends than APHDX: RSLAX (0.21) vs APHDX (0.00). APHDX was incepted earlier than RSLAX: APHDX (6 years) vs RSLAX (24 years). RSLAX (1.74) is less costly to investors than APHDX (1.10). APHDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.34 vs. RSLAX (41.00). RSLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than APHDX: RSLAX (250) vs APHDX (1000000). RSLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.70 vs. APHDX (-5.08). APHDX return over 5 years is better than : -2.97 vs. RSLAX (-8.40).
| APHDX | RSLAX | APHDX / RSLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.74 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.74 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.543 | 11.740 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 116M | 88.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.08 | 18.70 | -27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.72 | 33.39 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.97 | -8.40 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 68.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement