Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
APHDX vs RSLFX
APHDX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts APHDX vs RSLFX
APHDX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
APHDX vs. RSLFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APHDX is a Buy and RSLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. APHDX (109M). RSLFX pays higher dividends than APHDX: RSLFX (0.81) vs APHDX (0.00). APHDX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: APHDX (7 years) vs RSLFX (24 years). APHDX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). APHDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.34 vs. RSLFX (41.00). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than APHDX: RSLFX (250) vs APHDX (1000000). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.55 vs. APHDX (-12.69). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : -7.47 vs. APHDX (-14.39).
| APHDX | RSLFX | APHDX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.70 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.70 | 157% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.045 | 12.524 | 24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 109M | 91.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.81 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.69 | 9.55 | -133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.96 | 39.09 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.39 | -7.47 | 193% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 90.43 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement