Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
APHDX vs RSLFX
APHDX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts APHDX vs RSLFX
APHDX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
APHDX vs. RSLFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APHDX is a Buy and RSLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 88.9B vs. APHDX (116M). RSLFX pays higher dividends than APHDX: RSLFX (0.84) vs APHDX (0.00). APHDX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: APHDX (6 years) vs RSLFX (24 years). APHDX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). APHDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.34 vs. RSLFX (41.00). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than APHDX: RSLFX (250) vs APHDX (1000000). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.12 vs. APHDX (-5.08). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : -0.95 vs. APHDX (-2.97).
| APHDX | RSLFX | APHDX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.70 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.70 | 157% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.543 | 12.213 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 116M | 88.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.84 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.08 | 21.12 | -24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.72 | 38.99 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.97 | -0.95 | 311% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 96.09 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement