Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
APHGX vs TEDSX
APHGX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts APHGX vs TEDSX
Artisan Global Value Institutional
Price$26.22
Change+$0.10 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.71B
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$32.15
Change+$0.08 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.39B
APHGX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
APHGX vs. TEDSX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APHGX is a Buy and TEDSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.39B vs. APHGX (2.71B). APHGX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: APHGX (1.10) vs TEDSX (0.88). APHGX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: APHGX (13 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than APHGX (1.03). TEDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.55 vs. APHGX (16.35). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than APHGX: TEDSX (1000) vs APHGX (1000000). APHGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.33 vs. TEDSX (4.78). APHGX return over 5 years is better than : 80.19 vs. TEDSX (38.36).
| APHGX | TEDSX | APHGX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.96 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.96 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.020 | 14.535 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.71B | 9.39B | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.88 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.33 | 4.78 | 321% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.90 | 16.09 | 335% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.19 | 38.36 | 209% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.62 | 0.68 | 12,154% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers