Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
APHGX vs TEDSX
APHGX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts APHGX vs TEDSX
Artisan Global Value Institutional
Price$25.46
Change+$0.04 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.58B
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$31.07
Change+$0.05 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.13B
APHGX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
APHGX vs. TEDSX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APHGX is a Buy and TEDSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.13B vs. APHGX (2.58B). APHGX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: APHGX (1.13) vs TEDSX (0.91). APHGX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: APHGX (13 years) vs TEDSX (32 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than APHGX (1.03). TEDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.55 vs. APHGX (16.35). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than APHGX: TEDSX (1000) vs APHGX (1000000). APHGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.46 vs. TEDSX (0.55). APHGX return over 5 years is better than : 66.68 vs. TEDSX (24.13).
| APHGX | TEDSX | APHGX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.96 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.96 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.570 | 10.509 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.58B | 9.13B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 0.91 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.46 | 0.55 | 2,096% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.88 | 2.42 | 1,483% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.68 | 24.13 | 276% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.54 | -4.84 | -1,540% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement