Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
APHGX vs TEDSX
APHGX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts APHGX vs TEDSX
Artisan Global Value Institutional
Price$27.58
Change-$0.03 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.82B
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$31.68
Change-$0.15 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.13B
APHGX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
APHGX vs. TEDSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APHGX is a Hold and TEDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.13B vs. APHGX (2.82B). APHGX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: APHGX (1.03) vs TEDSX (0.75). APHGX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: APHGX (13 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). TEDSX (1.96) is less costly to investors than APHGX (1.03). TEDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.55 vs. APHGX (16.35). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than APHGX: TEDSX (1000) vs APHGX (1000000). APHGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.93 vs. TEDSX (1.97). APHGX return over 5 years is better than : 58.44 vs. TEDSX (22.13).
| APHGX | TEDSX | APHGX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.96 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.96 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.193 | 13.395 | 188% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.82B | 9.13B | 31% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.75 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.93 | 1.97 | 908% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.32 | 14.16 | 426% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.44 | 22.13 | 264% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.61 | 4.90 | 2,134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement