Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
APHMX vs FSMAX
APHMX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts APHMX vs FSMAX
APHMX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
APHMX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APHMX is a Buy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. APHMX (3.19B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than APHMX: FSMAX (0.48) vs APHMX (0.00). APHMX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: APHMX (26 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). APHMX (0.98) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). APHMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.54 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than APHMX: FSMAX (0) vs APHMX (1000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.38 vs. APHMX (1.82). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.12 vs. APHMX (-25.69).
| APHMX | FSMAX | APHMX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.04 | 2,800% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.04 | 2,800% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.042 | 15.913 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.19B | 43.5B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.82 | 24.38 | 7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.52 | 63.28 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.69 | 39.12 | -66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.68 | 139.20 | 2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers