Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
APHMX vs FSMAX
APHMX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts APHMX vs FSMAX
APHMX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
APHMX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APHMX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. APHMX (3.19B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than APHMX: FSMAX (0.50) vs APHMX (0.00). APHMX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: APHMX (26 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). APHMX (0.98) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). APHMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.54 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than APHMX: FSMAX (0) vs APHMX (1000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. APHMX (-6.65). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. APHMX (-31.91).
| APHMX | FSMAX | APHMX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.04 | 2,800% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.04 | 2,800% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.295 | 13.370 | 10% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.19B | 40.1B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.65 | 20.57 | -32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.28 | 55.83 | 6% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.91 | 33.18 | -96% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.30 | 133.82 | -2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers