Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
APHWX vs RMEBX
APHWX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts APHWX vs RMEBX
APHWX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. APHWX (4.46M). APHWX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: APHWX (2.16) vs RMEBX (0.99). APHWX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: APHWX (5 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). APHWX (2.13) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). APHWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.99 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than APHWX: RMEBX (250) vs APHWX (1000000). APHWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.74 vs. RMEBX (7.74).
| APHWX | RMEBX | APHWX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.07 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 1.07 | 199% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.665 | 10.180 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.46M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.16 | 0.99 | 218% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.74 | 7.74 | 165% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.43 | 35.79 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 34.92 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.35 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers