Advertisement
APO vs BN
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Apollo Global Management (APO) vs. Brookfield Corporation (BN) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Brookfield Corporation (BN) has delivered stronger one-year performance with approximately 25% returns, outperforming Apollo Global Management (APO)'s decline of around 5%.
- APO leads year-to-date with about 9.5% gains compared to BN's roughly 2% rise.
- APO exhibits robust quarterly revenue growth of 87.7% year-over-year and higher return on equity (ROE, a measure of profitability relative to shareholders' equity) at 14.7%.
- BN commands a larger market capitalization of around $101 billion versus APO's $75 billion.
- Both stocks benefit from positive analyst sentiment ahead of Q1 earnings, with APO on May 6 and BN on May 14.
- Recent market activity shows BN gaining over 10% in the past month amid deal momentum.
Introduction
Apollo Global Management (APO) and Brookfield Corporation (BN) are prominent players in the alternative asset management space, focusing on private credit, real assets, and infrastructure. This comparison highlights their relative performance, growth drivers, and market positioning in recent market conditions. Investors seeking exposure to financial services with diversification beyond traditional banking, or traders monitoring momentum in asset management, will find value in understanding contrasts in scale, momentum, and risk profiles. Both firms navigate interest rate dynamics and deal activity, making their stocks relevant for portfolios emphasizing long-term capital appreciation amid evolving economic landscapes.
APO Overview and Recent Performance
Apollo Global Management (APO) is a leading alternative asset manager specializing in private equity, credit, and real estate, managing substantial assets under management (AUM). In recent weeks, APO shares have rebounded toward the upper end of their 52-week range ($99.56–$157.28), trading around $130 with a market cap of $75 billion. Key influences include anticipation for Q1 earnings on May 6, with expected EPS of $1.98, and strategic moves like a $225 million investment in Pickleball Inc. via Apollo Sports Capital. Positive analyst updates, such as Morgan Stanley's Overweight rating, have supported sentiment, alongside broader financial sector rallies. Year-to-date gains of 9.5% reflect resilience, though quarterly earnings growth dipped 54% year-over-year.
BN Overview and Recent Performance
Brookfield Corporation (BN) operates as a global investment powerhouse with core holdings in real estate, renewable power, infrastructure, and private equity. Shares have shown upward momentum in recent market activity, advancing over 10% in the past month to around $45, within a 52-week range of $35.95–$49.57, backed by a $101 billion market cap. Developments include dividend declarations on preferred units, expansion in UK pensions for fee-based insurance growth, and bullish commentary from investors like Bill Ackman. Q1 earnings are slated for May 14, with analysts maintaining Buy ratings and targets up to $52. Steady quarterly revenue growth of 3.5% and a 72% earnings increase underpin performance, despite higher debt levels.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 performers from over 351 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like multi-agents, trend trading, and swing approaches on timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes, with standout annualized returns reaching 163%, win rates of 50–75%, and profit factors optimized for sectors like semiconductors and AI infrastructure. Examples include a multi-agent bot on USAR, SMR, CIFR yielding 163% annualized with 74.65% win rate, and semiconductor-focused bots at 97% returns. Ideal for copy trading with built-in risk management like take-profit/stop-loss corridors, they outperform benchmarks in volatile conditions. Explore these high-performing bots tailored to current markets for potential edge in automation.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both APO and BN thrive in alternative assets, but APO emphasizes credit and private equity, while BN offers broader exposure to real assets and infrastructure. Growth drivers differ: APO's explosive 87.7% quarterly revenue surge contrasts BN's steadier 3.5%, though BN scaled its capital base fourfold in three years. Recent momentum favors BN over one year (+25% vs. APO's -5%), but APO edges YTD. Risk profiles show BN's higher debt-to-equity (164% vs. 99%) and elevated trailing P/E (92 vs. 23), balanced by APO's forward P/E advantage (14 vs. 12). Market sentiment tilts positive for both amid M&A (mergers and acquisitions) activity and earnings catalysts, with BN drawing institutional interest.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward BN with higher probability for sustained outperformance, driven by superior one-year trend consistency, larger scale, and catalysts like capital expansion and institutional backing. APO offers compelling near-term positioning via growth metrics and earnings momentum, but BN's relative stability in broader market rotations edges it ahead probabilistically.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APO is a Hold and BN is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- APO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- BN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- APO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- BN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
APO (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.53% price change this week, while BN (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.17% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.34%.
Reported Earning Dates
APO is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
BN is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (-2.14% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| APO | BN | APO / BN | |
| Capitalization | 73.8B | 99.8B | 74% |
| EBITDA | 7.72B | 29.7B | 26% |
| Gain YTD | -10.822 | -2.637 | 410% |
| P/E Ratio | 80.52 | 87.45 | 92% |
| Revenue | 31.5B | 74.4B | 42% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 13.4B | 259B | 5% |
APO | BN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 79 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 46 | 28 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
APO's Valuation (83) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BN (87). This means that APO’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.
BN's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as APO (46). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to APO’s over the last 12 months.
BN's SMR Rating (90) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as APO (92). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to APO’s over the last 12 months.
BN's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as APO (51). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to APO’s over the last 12 months.
APO's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for BN (95). This means that APO’s stock grew significantly faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.
| APO | BN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 73% | 17 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 70% | 6 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 61% |
Advertisement
APO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APO has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APO jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.