APO
Price
$130.87
Change
+$0.06 (+0.05%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
63.9B
68 days until earnings call
BRDG
Price
$9.24
Change
+$0.02 (+0.22%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
280.98M
80 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

APO vs BRDG

Header iconAPO vs BRDG Comparison
Open Charts APO vs BRDGBanner chart's image
Apollo Global Management
Price$130.87
Change+$0.06 (+0.05%)
Volume$2.34M
Capitalization63.9B
Bridge Investment Group Holdings
Price$9.24
Change+$0.02 (+0.22%)
Volume$165.14K
Capitalization280.98M
APO vs BRDG Comparison Chart
Loading...
APO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BRDG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APO vs. BRDG commentary
May 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APO is a Hold and BRDG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 24, 2025
Stock price -- (APO: $130.87 vs. BRDG: $9.22)
Brand notoriety: APO and BRDG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APO: 53% vs. BRDG: 54%
Market capitalization -- APO: $63.9B vs. BRDG: $280.98M
APO [@Investment Managers] is valued at $63.9B. BRDG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $280.98M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBRDG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • APO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BRDG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, APO is a better buy in the long-term than BRDG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BRDG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • BRDG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BRDG is a better buy in the short-term than APO.

Price Growth

APO (@Investment Managers) experienced а -9.02% price change this week, while BRDG (@Investment Managers) price change was -8.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

APO is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

BRDG is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.81% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
APO($63.9B) has a higher market cap than BRDG($281M). BRDG has higher P/E ratio than APO: BRDG (26.30) vs APO (13.58). BRDG YTD gains are higher at: 11.324 vs. APO (-20.253). APO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.65B vs. BRDG (-36.42M). APO has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. BRDG (77.5M). BRDG has less debt than APO: BRDG (484M) vs APO (8.09B). APO has higher revenues than BRDG: APO (32.6B) vs BRDG (391M).
APOBRDGAPO / BRDG
Capitalization63.9B281M22,740%
EBITDA6.65B-36.42M-18,249%
Gain YTD-20.25311.324-179%
P/E Ratio13.5826.3052%
Revenue32.6B391M8,338%
Total Cash170B77.5M219,355%
Total Debt8.09B484M1,672%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APO: Fundamental Ratings
APO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
76
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
28
SMR RATING
1..100
53
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
11
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APOBRDG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BRDG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SHPAX18.87N/A
N/A
Saratoga Health & Biotechnology A
STVTX9.78N/A
N/A
Virtus Ceredex Large-Cap Value Equity I
SLGAX14.58N/A
N/A
SEI Large Cap F (SIMT)
ITHTX52.44-0.32
-0.61%
Hartford Capital Appreciation R5
HMCLX13.95-0.10
-0.71%
Harbor Mid Cap Institutional

BRDG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRDG has been loosely correlated with APO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRDG jumps, then APO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRDG
1D Price
Change %
BRDG100%
+0.22%
APO - BRDG
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
JHG - BRDG
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
CG - BRDG
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
BX - BRDG
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.00%
KKR - BRDG
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
More