APO
Price
$138.03
Change
+$1.63 (+1.20%)
Updated
Sep 12 closing price
Capitalization
78.02B
46 days until earnings call
OWL
Price
$18.75
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 12 closing price
Capitalization
12.21B
47 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

APO vs OWL

Header iconAPO vs OWL Comparison
Open Charts APO vs OWLBanner chart's image
Apollo Global Management
Price$138.03
Change+$1.63 (+1.20%)
Volume$2.31M
Capitalization78.02B
Blue Owl Capital
Price$18.75
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.64M
Capitalization12.21B
APO vs OWL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
APO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APO vs. OWL commentary
Sep 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APO is a Buy and OWL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 13, 2025
Stock price -- (APO: $138.03 vs. OWL: $18.75)
Brand notoriety: APO and OWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APO: 74% vs. OWL: 62%
Market capitalization -- APO: $78.02B vs. OWL: $12.21B
APO [@Investment Managers] is valued at $78.02B. OWL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $12.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $173.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOWL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • APO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, APO is a better buy in the long-term than OWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OWL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OWL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OWL is a better buy in the short-term than APO.

Price Growth

APO (@Investment Managers) experienced а +4.93% price change this week, while OWL (@Investment Managers) price change was +5.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

APO is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

OWL is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
APO($78B) has a higher market cap than OWL($12.2B). OWL has higher P/E ratio than APO: OWL (170.45) vs APO (25.45). APO YTD gains are higher at: -15.582 vs. OWL (-16.926). APO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.39B vs. OWL (804M). APO has more cash in the bank: 231B vs. OWL (118M). OWL has less debt than APO: OWL (3.65B) vs APO (12.1B). APO has higher revenues than OWL: APO (25.4B) vs OWL (2.62B).
APOOWLAPO / OWL
Capitalization78B12.2B639%
EBITDA7.39B804M919%
Gain YTD-15.582-16.92692%
P/E Ratio25.45170.4515%
Revenue25.4B2.62B970%
Total Cash231B118M195,763%
Total Debt12.1B3.65B332%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APO: Fundamental Ratings
APO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
60
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
34
SMR RATING
1..100
60
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APOOWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PHT8.340.04
+0.42%
Pioneer High Income Fund
SUPL37.82N/A
N/A
ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF
FSYD48.70-0.04
-0.08%
Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF
OMAH19.43-0.06
-0.31%
Vistashares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF
HFXI30.93-0.17
-0.55%
NYLI FTSE International Eq Ccy Netrl ETF

APO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APO has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APO jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APO
1D Price
Change %
APO100%
+1.20%
KKR - APO
86%
Closely correlated
-1.15%
OWL - APO
84%
Closely correlated
N/A
ARES - APO
82%
Closely correlated
-1.04%
CG - APO
81%
Closely correlated
-1.19%
TPG - APO
80%
Closely correlated
-1.29%
More