APO
Price
$126.01
Change
-$0.69 (-0.54%)
Updated
Oct 7, 01:32 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
72.48B
28 days until earnings call
OWL
Price
$16.28
Change
-$0.24 (-1.45%)
Updated
Oct 7, 03:13 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.76B
23 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

APO vs OWL

Header iconAPO vs OWL Comparison
Open Charts APO vs OWLBanner chart's image
Apollo Global Management
Price$126.01
Change-$0.69 (-0.54%)
Volume$511
Capitalization72.48B
Blue Owl Capital
Price$16.28
Change-$0.24 (-1.45%)
Volume$1.87K
Capitalization10.76B
APO vs OWL Comparison Chart in %
APO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APO vs. OWL commentary
Oct 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APO is a Hold and OWL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 07, 2025
Stock price -- (APO: $126.70 vs. OWL: $16.52)
Brand notoriety: APO and OWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APO: 133% vs. OWL: 168%
Market capitalization -- APO: $72.48B vs. OWL: $10.76B
APO [@Investment Managers] is valued at $72.48B. OWL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $10.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $182.61B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOWL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • APO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OWL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, APO is a better buy in the long-term than OWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OWL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • OWL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OWL is a better buy in the short-term than APO.

Price Growth

APO (@Investment Managers) experienced а -8.48% price change this week, while OWL (@Investment Managers) price change was -5.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +42.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

APO is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

OWL is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.45% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
APO($72.5B) has a higher market cap than OWL($10.8B). OWL has higher P/E ratio than APO: OWL (150.18) vs APO (23.64). APO YTD gains are higher at: -22.511 vs. OWL (-26.806). APO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.39B vs. OWL (804M). APO has more cash in the bank: 231B vs. OWL (118M). OWL has less debt than APO: OWL (3.65B) vs APO (12.1B). APO has higher revenues than OWL: APO (25.4B) vs OWL (2.62B).
APOOWLAPO / OWL
Capitalization72.5B10.8B671%
EBITDA7.39B804M919%
Gain YTD-22.511-26.80684%
P/E Ratio23.64150.1816%
Revenue25.4B2.62B970%
Total Cash231B118M195,763%
Total Debt12.1B3.65B332%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APO: Fundamental Ratings
APO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
37
SMR RATING
1..100
60
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
15
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APOOWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MMSC23.800.19
+0.79%
First Trust Multi-Manager Sm Cp Opps ETF
UUP27.620.13
+0.47%
Invesco DB US Dollar Bullish
CVLC82.680.12
+0.15%
Calvert US Large-Cp Cor Rspnb ETF
RSJN33.93-0.01
-0.04%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Eq Wght Buffr ETF - Jun
SCHH21.34-0.21
-0.97%
Schwab US REIT ETF™