APO
Price
$106.81
Change
-$0.53 (-0.49%)
Updated
Apr 19, 1:56 PM EST
13 days until earnings call
OWL
Price
$18.37
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 18, 6:59 PM EST
13 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

Analysis and predictions APO vs OWL

Header iconAPO vs OWL Comparison
Open Charts APO vs OWLBanner chart's image
Apollo Global Management
Price$106.81
Change-$0.53 (-0.49%)
Volume$2.93K
CapitalizationN/A
Blue Owl Capital
Price$18.37
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.1M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
APO vs OWL Comparison Chart

Loading...

APODaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
OWLDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
APO vs. OWL commentary
Apr 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APO is a StrongSell and OWL is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 19, 2024
Stock price -- (APO: $107.30 vs. OWL: $18.37)
Brand notoriety: APO and OWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APO: 67% vs. OWL: 68%
Market capitalization -- APO: $63.9B vs. OWL: $8.65B
APO [@Investment Managers] is valued at $63.9B. OWL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $8.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APO’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileOWL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • APO’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • OWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, APO is a better buy in the long-term than OWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OWL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OWL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OWL is a better buy in the short-term than APO.

Price Growth

APO (@Investment Managers) experienced а -5.06% price change this week, while OWL (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

APO is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2024.

OWL is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.64% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for APO with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for OWL with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
APO($63.9B) has a higher market cap than OWL($8.65B). OWL has higher P/E ratio than APO: OWL (185.70) vs APO (13.58). OWL YTD gains are higher at: 24.265 vs. APO (15.577). APO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.65B vs. OWL (633M). APO has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. OWL (104M). OWL has less debt than APO: OWL (2B) vs APO (8.09B). APO has higher revenues than OWL: APO (32.6B) vs OWL (1.73B).
APOOWLAPO / OWL
Capitalization63.9B8.65B739%
EBITDA6.65B633M1,050%
Gain YTD15.57724.26564%
P/E Ratio13.58185.707%
Revenue32.6B1.73B1,882%
Total Cash170B104M163,462%
Total Debt8.09B2B404%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APO: Fundamental Ratings
APO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
74
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6
SMR RATING
1..100
18
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
82
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APOOWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
APODaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
OWLDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IHF51.540.47
+0.93%
iShares US Healthcare Providers ETF
JPSV52.480.04
+0.07%
JPMorgan Active Small Cap Value ETF
KCE104.34-0.06
-0.06%
SPDR® S&P Capital Markets ETF
TIP105.62-0.14
-0.13%
iShares TIPS Bond ETF
PAWZ46.63-0.07
-0.15%
ProShares Pet Care ETF

APO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APO has been loosely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if APO jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APO
1D Price
Change %
APO100%
-0.18%
ARES - APO
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
KKR - APO
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.35%
TPG - APO
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
OWL - APO
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
AMP - APO
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
More