APO
Price
$120.47
Change
-$2.87 (-2.33%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
69.45B
16 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OWL
Price
$9.52
Change
-$0.10 (-1.04%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
6.43B
11 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

APO vs OWL

APO vs OWL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APO vs. OWL commentary
Jul 19, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APO is a Hold and OWL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 19, 2026
Stock price -- (APO: $120.47 vs. OWL: $9.52)
Brand notoriety: APO and OWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APO: 117% vs. OWL: 74%
Market capitalization -- APO: $69.45B vs. OWL: $6.43B
APO [@Investment Managers] is valued at $69.45B. OWL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $6.43B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $166.19B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOWL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • APO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both APO and OWL are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APO’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OWL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APO’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • OWL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, APO is a better buy in the short-term than OWL.

Price Growth

APO (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.11% price change this week, while OWL (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

APO is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

OWL is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.13% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
APO($69.5B) has a higher market cap than OWL($6.43B). OWL (79.33) and APO (75.77) have similar P/E ratio . APO YTD gains are higher at: -16.087 vs. OWL (-33.486). APO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.72B vs. OWL (951M). APO has more cash in the bank: 253B vs. OWL (190M). OWL has less debt than APO: OWL (4.36B) vs APO (14.2B). APO has higher revenues than OWL: APO (31.5B) vs OWL (2.94B).
APOOWLAPO / OWL
Capitalization69.5B6.43B1,080%
EBITDA7.72B951M812%
Gain YTD-16.087-33.48648%
P/E Ratio75.7779.3396%
Revenue31.5B2.94B1,071%
Total Cash253B190M133,158%
Total Debt14.2B4.36B326%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APO: Fundamental Ratings
APO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
52
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
73
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APOOWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OWL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CLSZ4.55N/A
N/A
Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF
BUSD.X0.999834-0.000158
-0.02%
BUSD cryptocurrency
UNL6.01N/A
-0.08%
United States 12 Month Natural Gas
IMX.X0.127099-0.000289
-0.23%
Immutable cryptocurrency
AGLD.X0.156876-0.000733
-0.46%
Adventure Gold cryptocurrency