APO
Price
$147.18
Change
-$1.03 (-0.69%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
63.9B
24 days until earnings call
OWL
Price
$18.91
Change
-$0.69 (-3.52%)
Updated
Jul 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.65B
20 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

APO vs OWL

Header iconAPO vs OWL Comparison
Open Charts APO vs OWLBanner chart's image
Apollo Global Management
Price$147.18
Change-$1.03 (-0.69%)
Volume$1.47M
Capitalization63.9B
Blue Owl Capital
Price$18.91
Change-$0.69 (-3.52%)
Volume$153.78K
Capitalization8.65B
APO vs OWL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
APO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APO vs. OWL commentary
Jul 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APO is a StrongBuy and OWL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 12, 2025
Stock price -- (APO: $147.18 vs. OWL: $19.60)
Brand notoriety: APO and OWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APO: 49% vs. OWL: 85%
Market capitalization -- APO: $63.9B vs. OWL: $8.65B
APO [@Investment Managers] is valued at $63.9B. OWL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $8.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOWL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • APO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, APO is a better buy in the long-term than OWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OWL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OWL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both APO and OWL are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

APO (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.88% price change this week, while OWL (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

APO is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

OWL is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.05% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
APO($63.9B) has a higher market cap than OWL($8.65B). OWL has higher P/E ratio than APO: OWL (185.70) vs APO (13.58). APO YTD gains are higher at: -10.315 vs. OWL (-14.135). APO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.65B vs. OWL (633M). APO has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. OWL (104M). OWL has less debt than APO: OWL (2B) vs APO (8.09B). APO has higher revenues than OWL: APO (32.6B) vs OWL (1.73B).
APOOWLAPO / OWL
Capitalization63.9B8.65B739%
EBITDA6.65B633M1,050%
Gain YTD-10.315-14.13573%
P/E Ratio13.58185.707%
Revenue32.6B1.73B1,882%
Total Cash170B104M163,462%
Total Debt8.09B2B404%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APO: Fundamental Ratings
APO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
18
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
29
SMR RATING
1..100
54
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APOOWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
64%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MLOIX8.810.03
+0.34%
Cohen & Steers Future of Energy I
NPFFX69.740.12
+0.17%
American Funds New Perspective F1
TIVRX32.070.02
+0.06%
Thornburg International Equity R5
CCGIX26.02N/A
N/A
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth Instl
VYCFX26.08N/A
N/A
Voya Corporate Leaders 100 R

APO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APO has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APO jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APO
1D Price
Change %
APO100%
-0.69%
KKR - APO
87%
Closely correlated
-1.40%
OWL - APO
83%
Closely correlated
-3.52%
ARES - APO
82%
Closely correlated
-1.53%
TPG - APO
81%
Closely correlated
-0.63%
CG - APO
81%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
More