Apollo Global Management (APO) and TPG Inc. (TPG) are prominent players in the alternative asset management industry, focusing on private equity, credit, real estate, and hedge funds. This stock comparison is particularly relevant for investors seeking exposure to the asset management sector amid evolving interest rate environments and robust demand for alternative investments. Traders analyzing relative performance, growth drivers, and market positioning will find value in understanding how these firms stack up in recent market activity, including earnings momentum and strategic developments.
Apollo Global Management (APO), one of the world's largest alternative asset managers, oversees $938.4 billion in AUM, including $709.1 billion in fee-earning assets. The firm invests across credit, private equity, real assets, and infrastructure, targeting institutional and high-net-worth clients globally. In recent market activity, APO shares have climbed about 16% over the past month, reflecting positive sentiment from strong AUM inflows, high quarterly revenue of $8.11 billion, and key deals such as funds acquiring Forvia's automotive interiors business and a 40% stake in Pembina Gas Infrastructure. Upcoming Q1 earnings are anticipated to show EPS of $1.98, bolstering near-term catalysts amid broader sector tailwinds.
TPG Inc. (TPG) is a global alternative asset manager investing through private equity, growth, impact, real estate, and credit platforms. The firm serves limited partners and other vehicles with a diversified approach across regions. Recent weeks have seen steady performance, with shares delivering a robust year-to-date gain of 29.84% following Q1 2026 results that exceeded expectations on EPS and revenue. Sentiment has been supported by fundraising successes, including $51 billion raised in 2025, and expansions like partnerships in Japanese logistics. Elevated dividend yield and analyst upgrades have contributed to resilience, though shares remain below 52-week highs amid valuation pressures.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 performers from over 350 AI trading bots designed to trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. These bots, including signal agents, virtual agents with risk management, and brokerage agents, showcase impressive stats: annualized returns from 23% to 163%, win rates of 51% to 88%, profit factors up to 11.70, and profit-to-drawdown ratios reaching 17.02. Focused on hot sectors like semiconductors, AI infrastructure, space, industrials, small caps, volatility, and gold miners, they employ AI/ML-driven technical and fundamental analyses with take-profit/stop-loss corridors. Traders can explore these high-performing bots for real-time signals and copy trading opportunities tailored to current volatility.
Both APO and TPG share business models centered on alternative investments, with exposure to private equity, credit, and real assets, but APO benefits from superior scale and diversification. Growth drivers for APO include massive AUM expansion toward $1 trillion and M&A activity (mergers and acquisitions), while TPG emphasizes impact investing and regional expansions. Recent momentum favors APO with sharper short-term gains, contrasting TPG's stronger YTD performance. Risk factors are similar—sensitivity to interest rates and dry powder deployment—but TPG's higher P/E signals potential overvaluation, offset by attractive yield. Market sentiment leans positive for both amid sector inflows, though APO enjoys broader analyst optimism.
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward APO with higher probability due to consistent upward trend in recent weeks, larger scale providing stability, and catalysts like earnings and deals. TPG remains compelling for yield and YTD strength, but relative momentum positions APO more favorably in the near term.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTPG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TPG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
APO (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.72% price change this week, while TPG (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.97% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.63%.
APO is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
TPG is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| APO | TPG | APO / TPG | |
| Capitalization | 73.7B | 7.14B | 1,033% |
| EBITDA | 8.48B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.362 | -29.428 | 39% |
| P/E Ratio | 80.37 | 193.39 | 42% |
| Revenue | 32B | 3.04B | 1,052% |
| Total Cash | 248B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 13.4B | 2.99B | 449% |
APO | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 82 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| APO | TPG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 53% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 72% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EVYM | 50.39 | -0.05 | -0.11% |
| Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF | |||
| DFAU | 50.40 | -0.23 | -0.45% |
| Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF | |||
| DWSH | 6.37 | -0.07 | -1.12% |
| AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF | |||
| LEGR | 63.68 | -0.86 | -1.33% |
| First Trust Indxx Invtv Tnsctn&Prcs ETF | |||
| SETM | 37.88 | -0.59 | -1.53% |
| Sprott Critical Materials ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TPG has been closely correlated with CG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TPG jumps, then CG could also see price increases.