APO
Price
$118.67
Change
+$3.37 (+2.92%)
Updated
Oct 9, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
70.27B
25 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TPG
Price
$45.22
Change
-$0.02 (-0.04%)
Updated
Oct 9, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.25B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

APO vs TPG

APO vs TPG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 05, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Apollo Global Management (APO) vs. TPG Inc. (TPG) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Scale contrast: APO manages roughly $1.05 trillion in assets, more than three times TPG's approximately $327 billion.
  • Growth momentum: TPG's fee-related earnings have grown faster, accelerating 36% to 43% year over year in recent quarters with expanding margins.
  • Relative performance: Both stocks have lagged the broader market this year, with TPG down more sharply than APO on a year-to-date basis.
  • Business mix: Apollo leans heavily into credit and retirement (insurance) services, while TPG is weighted toward private equity, growth, and software exposure.
  • Analyst sentiment: TPG carries a consensus "Buy" rating with an average price target well above its current price, while Apollo's near-term earnings estimates have trended downward.

Introduction

Alternative asset managers have become a central focus for investors seeking exposure to private equity, credit, and infrastructure, and few names draw more direct comparison than APO and TPG. Both firms generate fee-based earnings from capital they raise and deploy on behalf of institutional and individual clients, yet they differ sharply in size, strategy mix, and growth trajectory. This stock comparison examines how each company's market positioning and recent financial performance stack up, offering context for traders and long-term investors weighing these two franchises against one another in the current market environment.

APO Overview and Recent Performance

Apollo Global Management is one of the world's largest alternative asset managers, with approximately $1.05 trillion in assets under management (AUM, the total value of investments the firm oversees) as of mid-2026. The firm operates across two broad segments: asset management and Athene, its retirement services (insurance) arm. Apollo has built particular strength in investment-grade private credit origination, financing areas such as data-center infrastructure, energy, and other capital-intensive sectors.

In recent weeks, Apollo's shares have come under pressure, reflecting a broader reassessment of near-term risk and reward across the diversified financials space. The company reported record fee-related earnings (FRE, a measure of recurring earnings before performance income) and strong AUM growth, but its most recent quarterly adjusted earnings fell modestly short of consensus estimates as expenses rose. Analysts have trimmed forward estimates, and the stock carries a weaker momentum profile despite trading below many analyst price targets. Long-term returns remain substantial, even as short-term sentiment has cooled.

TPG Overview and Recent Performance

TPG Inc. is a leading global alternative asset manager founded in 1992, with approximately $327 billion in AUM as of mid-2026. The firm's platform spans private equity, growth equity, real estate, credit, and impact investing, with notable exposure to software and enterprise technology. TPG has also been expanding into credit and asset-based finance through partnerships such as its relationship with Jackson Financial.

TPG's recent results have shown accelerating fundamental momentum. Fee-related earnings grew 36% year over year in the first quarter and 43% in the second quarter, crossing $1 billion on a trailing-twelve-month basis for the first time. The firm has been beating consensus earnings estimates, expanding its FRE margin toward its full-year target, and setting records for capital raising and deployment. Despite this operational strength, the stock has declined sharply this year as multiple compression across its private equity portfolio and broader market volatility weighed on sentiment.

Trending AI Robots

For traders looking to navigate comparisons like this one, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated view of automated trading strategies. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers, but only the strategies best suited to current market conditions earn a place in this featured section. These bots span a wide range of trading styles, timeframes, performance statistics, and ticker sets, allowing users to evaluate approaches that match different risk tolerances and objectives. Because each bot applies its own strategy, the page serves as a practical starting point for identifying systems that align with prevailing market trends. Explore the Trending AI Robots to review the currently featured strategies.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The clearest contrast between the two companies is scale and diversification. Apollo's roughly $1.05 trillion AUM base, combined with its insurance-linked retirement services business, gives it a more defensive, credit-heavy earnings stream and greater capacity to originate large financings. TPG, at roughly $327 billion in AUM, is a smaller, faster-growing franchise with heavier private equity and growth-equity exposure, which makes its earnings more sensitive to realizations and public-market valuation shifts.

On growth drivers, TPG has demonstrated stronger recent momentum, with faster FRE growth, margin expansion, and consistent earnings beats. Apollo's growth is more tied to credit origination and retirement services inflows, areas that have performed well but face scrutiny around private credit transparency and valuation. Risk profiles differ accordingly: TPG carries more software and private-equity valuation risk, while Apollo's exposure centers on credit markets and insurance liabilities. Sector exposure and market sentiment currently favor TPG's fundamentals, though Apollo's larger scale and diversified fee base may offer greater earnings stability during periods of dislocation.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, earnings momentum, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely lean toward TPG at present. The firm's accelerating fee-related earnings growth, expanding margins, and record capital deployment signal positive fundamental momentum, even though its share price has lagged. Apollo's scale and credit franchise remain formidable, but recent estimate revisions and a softer momentum profile introduce more near-term uncertainty. This assessment is probabilistic rather than definitive, reflecting the AI's focus on trend strength and stability across each stock's recent data series.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
APO vs. TPG commentary
Oct 09, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APO is a Hold and TPG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APO: Fundamental Ratings
APO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
58
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
54
SMR RATING
1..100
88
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APOTPG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 09, 2026
Stock price -- (APO: $115.30 vs. TPG: $45.24)
Brand notoriety: APO and TPG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APO: 137% vs. TPG: 149%
Market capitalization -- APO: $70.27B vs. TPG: $7.25B
APO [@Investment Managers] is valued at $70.27B. TPG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $7.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $57 to $165.9B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $8.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while TPG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • APO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TPG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, APO is a better buy in the long-term than TPG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TPG’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TPG’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TPG is a better buy in the short-term than APO.

Price Growth

APO (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.84% price change this week, while TPG (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

APO is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.

TPG is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.67% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

View a ticker or compare two or three
APO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TPG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EDRY60.794.48
+7.96%
EuroDry Ltd
FOX56.970.99
+1.77%
Fox Corp
DORM121.67-1.20
-0.98%
Dorman Products
MTW21.72-0.33
-1.50%
Manitowoc Company (The)
BTOC0.22N/A
-2.08%
Armlogi Holding Corp

APO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APO has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APO jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APO
1D Price
Change %
APO100%
-0.22%
KKR - APO
81%
Closely correlated
-0.12%
ARES - APO
78%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
BX - APO
76%
Closely correlated
+0.76%
TPG - APO
73%
Closely correlated
+1.64%
BAM - APO
70%
Closely correlated
+1.51%
More

TPG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TPG has been closely correlated with CG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TPG jumps, then CG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TPG
1D Price
Change %
TPG100%
+1.64%
CG - TPG
79%
Closely correlated
+1.56%
KKR - TPG
78%
Closely correlated
-0.12%
ARES - TPG
78%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
OWL - TPG
75%
Closely correlated
+1.76%
BX - TPG
75%
Closely correlated
+0.76%
More