APPF
Price
$179.90
Change
+$4.32 (+2.46%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
6.36B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MANH
Price
$158.31
Change
+$3.41 (+2.20%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
9.37B
14 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

APPF vs MANH

APPF vs MANH Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APPF vs. MANH commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APPF is a StrongBuy and MANH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (APPF: $179.90 vs. MANH: $158.31)
Brand notoriety: APPF and MANH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APPF: 37% vs. MANH: 35%
Market capitalization -- APPF: $6.36B vs. MANH: $9.37B
APPF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $6.36B. MANH’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $9.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $195.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMANH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • APPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MANH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MANH is a better buy in the long-term than APPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APPF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MANH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MANH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both APPF and MANH are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

APPF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +2.18% price change this week, while MANH (@Packaged Software) price change was +2.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

APPF is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

MANH is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.53% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MANH($9.37B) has a higher market cap than APPF($6.36B). MANH (44.37) and APPF (42.85) have similar P/E ratio . MANH YTD gains are higher at: -8.655 vs. APPF (-22.674). MANH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 288M vs. APPF (194M). MANH has more cash in the bank: 226M vs. APPF (152M). APPF has less debt than MANH: APPF (37M) vs MANH (55.7M). MANH has higher revenues than APPF: MANH (1.1B) vs APPF (995M).
APPFMANHAPPF / MANH
Capitalization6.36B9.37B68%
EBITDA194M288M67%
Gain YTD-22.674-8.655262%
P/E Ratio42.8544.3797%
Revenue995M1.1B90%
Total Cash152M226M67%
Total Debt37M55.7M66%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APPF vs MANH: Fundamental Ratings
APPF
MANH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2030
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8595
SMR RATING
1..100
3112
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5750
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5774
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

APPF's Valuation (72) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as MANH (89) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that APPF’s stock grew similarly to MANH’s over the last 12 months.

APPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (85) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as MANH (95) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that APPF’s stock grew similarly to MANH’s over the last 12 months.

MANH's SMR Rating (12) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as APPF (31) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that MANH’s stock grew similarly to APPF’s over the last 12 months.

MANH's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as APPF (57) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that MANH’s stock grew similarly to APPF’s over the last 12 months.

APPF's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as MANH (74) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that APPF’s stock grew similarly to MANH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APPFMANH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MANH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MKR.X1454.21390062.977295
+4.53%
Maker cryptocurrency
SCRT.X0.0416740.001083
+2.67%
Secret cryptocurrency
GNO.X110.492170-0.981331
-0.88%
Gnosis cryptocurrency
DUSK.X0.073975-0.001912
-2.52%
Dusk cryptocurrency
HIGH.X0.025977-0.001016
-3.76%
Highstreet cryptocurrency

MANH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MANH has been closely correlated with DT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MANH jumps, then DT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MANH
1D Price
Change %
MANH100%
+2.20%
DT - MANH
66%
Closely correlated
+2.08%
PCTY - MANH
66%
Loosely correlated
+5.06%
INTA - MANH
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.75%
PCOR - MANH
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.62%
WDAY - MANH
64%
Loosely correlated
+4.26%
More