APPF
Price
$180.19
Change
+$4.17 (+2.37%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
6.38B
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MANH
Price
$191.36
Change
+$0.39 (+0.20%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
11.16B
85 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

APPF vs MANH

APPF vs MANH Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 26, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? AppFolio (APPF) vs. Manhattan Associates (MANH) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • AppFolio (APPF) is a high-growth cloud platform for the real estate industry, while Manhattan Associates (MANH) is a mature leader in supply chain and omnichannel commerce software.
  • APPF delivered approximately 20% revenue growth in fiscal 2025, significantly outpacing MANH's roughly 4% top-line expansion, yet MANH commands a meaningfully higher adjusted operating margin of around 35%.
  • Both companies are investing aggressively in artificial intelligence: APPF has embedded agentic AI into its real estate platform, while MANH recently released AI agents for supply chain optimization.
  • MANH has returned substantial capital to shareholders through aggressive buybacks — $274.5 million in fiscal 2025 — whereas APPF prioritizes reinvestment for growth and holds zero debt.
  • From a market positioning standpoint, APPF offers higher growth but greater sector-concentration risk tied to real estate, while MANH provides a more diversified, cash-rich profile with slower but steadier expansion.
  • Both stocks have pulled back considerably from their 52-week highs, creating a more balanced entry landscape that makes their relative value and momentum dynamics especially relevant for comparison.

Introduction

When evaluating software companies for a portfolio, investors often face a classic tension: high-growth disruptors versus profitability-rich incumbents. This comparison between APPF (AppFolio) and MANH (Manhattan Associates) captures that tension precisely. Both are well-established names in the application software space, yet they serve entirely different end markets — real estate versus global supply chains — and operate with contrasting growth profiles, margin structures, and capital allocation philosophies. For traders and investors seeking to understand how two mid-to-large-cap software stocks stack up in the current market environment, this head-to-head analysis examines recent performance, strategic positioning, and the factors that may drive relative outperformance in the months ahead.

APPF Overview and Recent Performance

AppFolio is a technology leader powering the real estate industry through its cloud-based property management platform. The company serves property managers, real estate investors, and rental property owners with tools spanning leasing, maintenance, accounting, and resident experience. In recent market activity, APPF has demonstrated robust operational momentum. For fiscal year 2025, the company reported revenue of $951 million, representing 20% year-over-year growth, while units under management expanded 8% to reach 9.4 million across more than 22,000 customers.

AppFolio's strategic narrative has become increasingly AI-driven. The company's "Realm-X Performers" — agentic AI modules that automate leasing, maintenance, and resident communications — have seen rapid adoption, with 98% of customers now actively using one or more AI capabilities. The company's premium tier strategy is also gaining traction, with Plus and Max tiers exceeding 25% adoption among its customer base. However, the stock has faced valuation compression in recent months, trading well below its 52-week high. Concerns around decelerating unit growth, real estate market headwinds including elevated vacancy rates, and a premium valuation relative to the broader software industry have weighed on sentiment, even as the underlying business continues to execute. AppFolio's 2026 guidance projects revenue of $1.1 billion to $1.12 billion, with non-GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles) operating margins expanding to 25.5%–27.5%.

MANH Overview and Recent Performance

Manhattan Associates is a leading provider of supply chain and omnichannel commerce solutions, serving retailers, wholesalers, manufacturers, and logistics providers worldwide. The company's software coordinates people, workflows, assets, and tasks across complex supply chain ecosystems — from planning through execution. In recent quarters, MANH has demonstrated strengthening business momentum, anchored by a decisive transition to cloud-based subscription revenue. For fiscal 2025, Manhattan Associates reported total revenue of $1.08 billion, with cloud subscription revenue surging 21% to $408 million — even as legacy license and services revenues continued their structural decline.

A defining feature of MANH's recent performance has been margin excellence and capital discipline. The company's adjusted operating margin reached approximately 35% for full-year 2025, placing it among the more profitable names in enterprise software. Cash flow from operations surged to $389.5 million, up from $295 million in the prior year, while aggressive share repurchases totaled $274.5 million — a clear signal of management's confidence. The company recently announced its first AI agents for supply chain optimization, targeting its Active customer community. MANH's 2026 guidance calls for total revenue of $1.133 billion to $1.153 billion, implying 5%–7% growth, with adjusted operating margins expected between 34.5% and 35.0%. While revenue growth is more modest than APPF's, the consistency and quality of MANH's earnings profile have historically attracted a different type of investor.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking an analytically grounded edge in evaluating stocks like APPF and MANH, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated window into AI-driven trading strategies across thousands of tickers. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots, each equipped with distinct trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and risk parameters — but only the most consistently effective and market-adaptive robots earn a place in the Trending section. These bots are powered by Financial Learning Models (FLMs), proprietary AI architectures that continuously ingest price action, volume data, and volatility signals. Recent performance data shows top AI agents delivering annualized returns ranging from approximately 50% to over 190%, with win rates frequently exceeding 65% and profit factors (a measure of reward per unit of risk) climbing above 2.0 in many strategies. Whether a trader favors short-term momentum, swing trading, or sector-specific themes, exploring the Trending AI Robots can provide valuable perspective on how AI systems are navigating today's market conditions.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The most immediate contrast between APPF and MANH lies in their growth-versus-profitability profiles. AppFolio's 20% revenue growth in fiscal 2025 far exceeds MANH's 4% top-line expansion, reflecting APPF's earlier-stage market penetration in real estate technology and its successful monetization of value-added services such as payments, tenant screening, and insurance. MANH, by comparison, is further along in its cloud transition — a process that depresses reported revenue growth as license revenue gives way to ratable subscription streams — but rewards shareholders with an adjusted operating margin of roughly 35%, more than 10 percentage points above APPF's comparable metric.

Sector exposure represents another critical differentiator. AppFolio is deeply tethered to the U.S. real estate market, which introduces cyclical risk: if property vacancy rates rise or transaction volumes slow, demand for property management software could moderate. Manhattan Associates serves a broader, globally diversified base of supply chain operators — retailers, manufacturers, and logistics firms — and benefits from secular trends in e-commerce, warehouse automation, and supply chain digitization. On the capital allocation front, MANH's aggressive buyback program and $328.7 million cash position signal a shareholder-return orientation, while APPF's lean balance sheet (with minimal debt and a focus on reinvestment) reflects a growth-first philosophy. Both companies have recently pulled back from elevated valuations, but MANH has held up somewhat better on a year-to-date basis, suggesting relative resilience in risk-off conditions.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, earnings momentum, and relative market positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely lean toward MANH in the current environment — but with important nuance. MANH's combination of a 35% adjusted operating margin, record cloud bookings, rising RPO (Remaining Performance Obligation, a forward-looking measure of contracted but unrecognized revenue), and aggressive capital return through buybacks presents a more stable and cash-generative profile that AI models often favor during periods of broader market uncertainty. The company's guided revenue growth of 5%–7% for 2026, while modest, is underpinned by high-visibility recurring cloud subscriptions. Conversely, APPF's higher growth trajectory and leadership in AI-native real estate software make it the higher-upside candidate — particularly if real estate market sentiment improves. AI models that emphasize momentum and growth catalysts may tilt toward APPF, while those prioritizing margin quality, cash flow durability, and lower volatility would likely assign a higher probability of near-term outperformance to MANH. The verdict is probabilistic, not definitive, and depends heavily on the strategy and risk tolerance embedded in the model.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
APPF vs. MANH commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APPF is a Buy and MANH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (APPF: $180.19 vs. MANH: $191.36)
Brand notoriety: APPF and MANH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APPF: 40% vs. MANH: 86%
Market capitalization -- APPF: $6.38B vs. MANH: $11.16B
APPF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $6.38B. MANH’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $11.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $400.93B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMANH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • APPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MANH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MANH is a better buy in the long-term than APPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APPF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MANH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APPF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MANH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, APPF is a better buy in the short-term than MANH.

Price Growth

APPF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +9.17% price change this week, while MANH (@Packaged Software) price change was +26.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

APPF is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

MANH is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.35% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MANH($11.2B) has a higher market cap than APPF($6.38B). MANH has higher P/E ratio than APPF: MANH (54.83) vs APPF (41.05). MANH YTD gains are higher at: 10.415 vs. APPF (-22.549). MANH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 288M vs. APPF (205M). MANH (226M) and APPF (222M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . APPF has less debt than MANH: APPF (35.8M) vs MANH (55.7M). MANH has higher revenues than APPF: MANH (1.1B) vs APPF (1.04B).
APPFMANHAPPF / MANH
Capitalization6.38B11.2B57%
EBITDA205M288M71%
Gain YTD-22.54910.415-217%
P/E Ratio41.0554.8375%
Revenue1.04B1.1B95%
Total Cash222M226M98%
Total Debt35.8M55.7M64%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APPF vs MANH: Fundamental Ratings
APPF
MANH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8484
SMR RATING
1..100
3213
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5637
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7164
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

APPF's Valuation (71) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as MANH (92) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that APPF’s stock grew similarly to MANH’s over the last 12 months.

APPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as MANH (84) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that APPF’s stock grew similarly to MANH’s over the last 12 months.

MANH's SMR Rating (13) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as APPF (32) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that MANH’s stock grew similarly to APPF’s over the last 12 months.

MANH's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as APPF (56) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that MANH’s stock grew similarly to APPF’s over the last 12 months.

MANH's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as APPF (71) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that MANH’s stock grew similarly to APPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APPFMANH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MANH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CLPT14.940.36
+2.47%
ClearPoint Neuro
PBH50.220.27
+0.54%
Prestige Consumer Healthcare
WAFDP16.31-0.17
-1.03%
WaFd
CORT114.49-3.83
-3.24%
Corcept Therapeutics
MB3.80-0.22
-5.47%
Masterbeef Group

APPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APPF has been loosely correlated with ADSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if APPF jumps, then ADSK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APPF
1D Price
Change %
APPF100%
+2.37%
ADSK - APPF
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.33%
BSY - APPF
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
MANH - APPF
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
PCTY - APPF
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
BL - APPF
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.41%
More