It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APPS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMRT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APPS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRT’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
APPS (@Packaged Software) experienced а -17.25% price change this week, while MRT (@Packaged Software) price change was -9.81% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.60%.
APPS is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
APPS | MRT | APPS / MRT | |
Capitalization | 267M | 39.8M | 671% |
EBITDA | 55.3M | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 39.053 | -15.929 | -245% |
P/E Ratio | 63.29 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 572M | N/A | - |
Total Cash | 49M | 3.97M | 1,234% |
Total Debt | 374M | 28.4M | 1,317% |
APPS | MRT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 95 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | 6 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MRT's Valuation (6) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for APPS (74) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that MRT’s stock grew significantly faster than APPS’s over the last 12 months.
MRT's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as APPS (100) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that MRT’s stock grew similarly to APPS’s over the last 12 months.
APPS's SMR Rating (96) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as MRT (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that APPS’s stock grew similarly to MRT’s over the last 12 months.
MRT's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as APPS (61) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that MRT’s stock grew similarly to APPS’s over the last 12 months.
APPS's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MRT (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that APPS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MRT’s over the last 12 months.
APPS | MRT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago50% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago41% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago36% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago58% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago61% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% | 20 days ago71% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago80% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago63% | 2 days ago47% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago77% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
LCORX | 20.29 | -0.52 | -2.50% |
Managed Port Sr-Leuthold Cor InvtRet | |||
STREX | 20.37 | -1.15 | -5.34% |
Sterling Capital Equity Income R6 | |||
PMVEX | 21.51 | -1.29 | -5.66% |
PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Val R2 | |||
CNZLX | 9.77 | -0.60 | -5.79% |
Commonwealth Australia/New Zealand | |||
PRJDX | 36.81 | -2.28 | -5.83% |
PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities R4 |
A.I.dvisor tells us that MRT and HCAT have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MRT and HCAT's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MRT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MRT | 100% | -2.06% | ||
HCAT - MRT | 28% Poorly correlated | -3.14% | ||
LGZDF - MRT | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
EBYH - MRT | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
APPS - MRT | 25% Poorly correlated | -9.09% | ||
PDFS - MRT | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.94% | ||
More |