It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APYX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APYX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
APYX (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -26.92% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +1.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.72%.
APYX is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
APYX | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 55 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 39 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| APYX | RCG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 87% | 12 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CORD | 2.36 | 0.08 | +3.29% |
| T-REX 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF | |||
| MAYT | 39.99 | 0.11 | +0.27% |
| AllianzIM US Equity Buffer10 May ETF | |||
| USHY | 36.89 | 0.07 | +0.19% |
| iShares Broad USD High Yield Corp Bd ETF | |||
| IWMW | 40.19 | 0.03 | +0.08% |
| iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF | |||
| MLPI | 54.33 | -0.03 | -0.06% |
| NEOS MLP & Engy Infras Hi Inc ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor tells us that APYX and ITOC have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that APYX and ITOC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To APYX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| APYX | 100% | -0.33% | ||
| ITOC - APYX | 26% Poorly correlated | +7.85% | ||
| CLPT - APYX | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.52% | ||
| SGHT - APYX | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.16% | ||
| EMBC - APYX | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.20% | ||
| A - APYX | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.51% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor tells us that RCG and MSB have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RCG and MSB's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCG | 100% | -1.75% | ||
| MSB - RCG | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.09% | ||
| CACI - RCG | 11% Poorly correlated | -1.48% | ||
| APYX - RCG | 6% Poorly correlated | +1.67% | ||
| FTLF - RCG | 4% Poorly correlated | +9.06% | ||
| TPL - RCG | 3% Poorly correlated | +1.25% | ||
More | ||||