Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AQEAX vs RWMFX
AQEAX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts AQEAX vs RWMFX
AQEAX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AQEAX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AQEAX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. AQEAX (5.2B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than AQEAX: RWMFX (1.40) vs AQEAX (0.47). AQEAX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: AQEAX (23 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). AQEAX (0.94) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). AQEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AQEAX: RWMFX (250) vs AQEAX (2000). AQEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.71 vs. RWMFX (8.10). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.71 vs. AQEAX (13.39).
| AQEAX | RWMFX | AQEAX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.31 | 303% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.31 | 303% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.825 | 5.575 | 140% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.2B | 214B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 1.40 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.71 | 8.10 | 157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.35 | 33.11 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.39 | 26.71 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.40 | 85.42 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement