Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AQEAX vs RWMFX
AQEAX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts AQEAX vs RWMFX
AQEAX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AQEAX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AQEAX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. AQEAX (5.17B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than AQEAX: RWMFX (1.41) vs AQEAX (0.46). AQEAX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: AQEAX (23 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). AQEAX (0.94) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). AQEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RWMFX (32.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AQEAX: RWMFX (250) vs AQEAX (2000). AQEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.31 vs. RWMFX (2.09). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.39 vs. AQEAX (7.70).
| AQEAX | RWMFX | AQEAX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.31 | 303% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.31 | 303% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.947 | 4.508 | 221% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.17B | 218B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 1.41 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.31 | 2.09 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.18 | 30.24 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.70 | 27.39 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.41 | 82.36 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers