AQMS
Price
$1.98
Change
-$0.03 (-1.49%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
79.15M
33 days until earnings call
LICY
Price
$1.13
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
184.42M
Ad is loading...

AQMS vs LICY

Header iconAQMS vs LICY Comparison
Open Charts AQMS vs LICYBanner chart's image
Aqua Metals
Price$1.98
Change-$0.03 (-1.49%)
Volume$72.14K
Capitalization79.15M
Li-Cycle Holdings
Price$1.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.41M
Capitalization184.42M
AQMS vs LICY Comparison Chart
Loading...
AQMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LICY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AQMS vs. LICY commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AQMS is a Hold and LICY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (AQMS: $1.98 vs. LICY: $1.13)
Brand notoriety: AQMS and LICY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AQMS: 29% vs. LICY: 141%
Market capitalization -- AQMS: $79.15M vs. LICY: $184.42M
AQMS [@Environmental Services] is valued at $79.15M. LICY’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $184.42M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $85.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AQMS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLICY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AQMS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LICY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LICY is a better buy in the long-term than AQMS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AQMS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LICY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AQMS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LICY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AQMS is a better buy in the short-term than LICY.

Price Growth

AQMS (@Environmental Services) experienced а -14.29% price change this week, while LICY (@Environmental Services) price change was -37.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

AQMS is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

LICY is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+0.38% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LICY($184M) has a higher market cap than AQMS($79.2M). AQMS YTD gains are higher at: -21.429 vs. LICY (-36.872). AQMS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -16.17M vs. LICY (-121.4M). LICY has more cash in the bank: 70.6M vs. AQMS (25.6M). AQMS has less debt than LICY: AQMS (3.3M) vs LICY (351M). LICY has higher revenues than AQMS: LICY (18.3M) vs AQMS (25K).
AQMSLICYAQMS / LICY
Capitalization79.2M184M43%
EBITDA-16.17M-121.4M13%
Gain YTD-21.429-36.87258%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue25K18.3M0%
Total Cash25.6M70.6M36%
Total Debt3.3M351M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AQMS: Fundamental Ratings
AQMS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
85
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AQMSLICY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AQMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LICY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WFATX38.830.22
+0.57%
Allspring Index Asset Allocation Instl
FCPVX21.180.11
+0.52%
Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund
AGAZX12.270.03
+0.25%
Allspring Global Long/Short Equity Inst
GRSPX26.060.06
+0.23%
Cromwell Greenspring Mid Cap Instl
WGISX12.42-0.01
-0.08%
Wasatch International Select Instl

AQMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AQMS and NWLXF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AQMS and NWLXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AQMS
1D Price
Change %
AQMS100%
-1.49%
NWLXF - AQMS
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CWST - AQMS
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
MEG - AQMS
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.62%
PESI - AQMS
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
NVRI - AQMS
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
More

LICY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LICY has been loosely correlated with NVRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LICY jumps, then NVRI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LICY
1D Price
Change %
LICY100%
N/A
NVRI - LICY
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
AQMS - LICY
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.49%
CLH - LICY
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
WM - LICY
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
CWST - LICY
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
More