Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ARBNX vs HMEAX
ARBNX vs HMEAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ARBNX vs. HMEAX commentary
Sep 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARBNX is a Hold and HMEAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HMEAX has more cash in the bank: 1.14B vs. ARBNX (735M). HMEAX pays higher dividends than ARBNX: HMEAX (4.79) vs ARBNX (0.67). ARBNX was incepted earlier than HMEAX: ARBNX (22 years) vs HMEAX (9 years). HMEAX (2.74) is less costly to investors than ARBNX (1.53). HMEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 556.00 vs. ARBNX (162.00). HMEAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ARBNX: HMEAX (2500) vs ARBNX (100000). ARBNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.78 vs. HMEAX (5.42). HMEAX return over 5 years is better than : 16.82 vs. ARBNX (6.04).
| ARBNX | HMEAX | ARBNX / HMEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 2.49 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 2.74 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.733 | 4.372 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 735M | 1.14B | 64% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 4.79 | 14% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.78 | 5.42 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.91 | 16.03 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.04 | 16.82 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.58 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement