ARES
Price
$191.32
Change
+$3.42 (+1.82%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
25.71B
19 days until earnings call
OWL
Price
$24.28
Change
+$0.88 (+3.76%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
8.65B
19 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ARES vs OWL

Header iconARES vs OWL Comparison
Open Charts ARES vs OWLBanner chart's image
Ares Management
Price$191.32
Change+$3.42 (+1.82%)
Volume$721.77K
Capitalization25.71B
Blue Owl Capital
Price$24.28
Change+$0.88 (+3.76%)
Volume$7.71M
Capitalization8.65B
ARES vs OWL Comparison Chart
Loading...
ARES
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ARES vs. OWL commentary
Jan 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARES is a Hold and OWL is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 18, 2025
Stock price -- (ARES: $191.32 vs. OWL: $24.28)
Brand notoriety: ARES and OWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARES: 61% vs. OWL: 124%
Market capitalization -- ARES: $25.71B vs. OWL: $8.65B
ARES [@Investment Managers] is valued at $25.71B. OWL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $8.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARES’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOWL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ARES’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ARES is a better buy in the long-term than OWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ARES’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OWL’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ARES’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • OWL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ARES is a better buy in the short-term than OWL.

Price Growth

ARES (@Investment Managers) experienced а +9.30% price change this week, while OWL (@Investment Managers) price change was +7.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

ARES is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2025.

OWL is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.49% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ARES($25.7B) has a higher market cap than OWL($8.65B). OWL has higher P/E ratio than ARES: OWL (185.70) vs ARES (54.71). ARES YTD gains are higher at: 8.072 vs. OWL (4.385). ARES has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.43B vs. OWL (633M). ARES has more cash in the bank: 1.5B vs. OWL (104M). OWL has less debt than ARES: OWL (2B) vs ARES (15.8B). ARES has higher revenues than OWL: ARES (4.99B) vs OWL (1.73B).
ARESOWLARES / OWL
Capitalization25.7B8.65B297%
EBITDA2.43B633M383%
Gain YTD8.0724.385184%
P/E Ratio54.71185.7029%
Revenue4.99B1.73B288%
Total Cash1.5B104M1,440%
Total Debt15.8B2B790%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ARES: Fundamental Ratings
ARES
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
25
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2
SMR RATING
1..100
52
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
22
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARESOWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
71%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ARES
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GBTG9.000.03
+0.33%
Global Business Travel Group
CW366.921.01
+0.28%
Curtiss-Wright Corp
AMBC11.42-0.03
-0.26%
Ambac Financial Group
III3.20-0.05
-1.54%
Information Services Group
MARPS4.37-0.07
-1.59%
Marine Petroleum Trust

ARES and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARES has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ARES jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARES
1D Price
Change %
ARES100%
+1.82%
KKR - ARES
78%
Closely correlated
+2.83%
APO - ARES
70%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
TPG - ARES
70%
Closely correlated
+2.34%
OWL - ARES
69%
Closely correlated
+3.76%
CG - ARES
67%
Closely correlated
+1.79%
More