ARES
Price
$186.29
Change
+$3.95 (+2.17%)
Updated
Jul 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
25.71B
6 days until earnings call
OWL
Price
$20.02
Change
-$0.29 (-1.43%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
8.65B
5 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ARES vs OWL

Header iconARES vs OWL Comparison
Open Charts ARES vs OWLBanner chart's image
Ares Management
Price$186.29
Change+$3.95 (+2.17%)
Volume$12.7K
Capitalization25.71B
Blue Owl Capital
Price$20.02
Change-$0.29 (-1.43%)
Volume$8.93M
Capitalization8.65B
ARES vs OWL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ARES
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ARES vs. OWL commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARES is a StrongBuy and OWL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (ARES: $186.22 vs. OWL: $20.02)
Brand notoriety: ARES and OWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARES: 94% vs. OWL: 124%
Market capitalization -- ARES: $25.71B vs. OWL: $8.65B
ARES [@Investment Managers] is valued at $25.71B. OWL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $8.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARES’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOWL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ARES’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ARES is a better buy in the long-term than OWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ARES’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OWL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ARES’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OWL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OWL is a better buy in the short-term than ARES.

Price Growth

ARES (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.69% price change this week, while OWL (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

ARES is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

OWL is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.65% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ARES($25.7B) has a higher market cap than OWL($8.65B). OWL has higher P/E ratio than ARES: OWL (185.70) vs ARES (54.71). ARES YTD gains are higher at: 6.731 vs. OWL (-12.295). ARES has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.43B vs. OWL (633M). ARES has more cash in the bank: 1.5B vs. OWL (104M). OWL has less debt than ARES: OWL (2B) vs ARES (15.8B). ARES has higher revenues than OWL: ARES (4.99B) vs OWL (1.73B).
ARESOWLARES / OWL
Capitalization25.7B8.65B297%
EBITDA2.43B633M383%
Gain YTD6.731-12.295-55%
P/E Ratio54.71185.7029%
Revenue4.99B1.73B288%
Total Cash1.5B104M1,440%
Total Debt15.8B2B790%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ARES: Fundamental Ratings
ARES
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
82
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
21
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
13
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARESOWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ARES
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TGLR33.520.15
+0.45%
LAFFER|TENGLER Equity Income ETF
JTEK85.340.35
+0.41%
JPMorgan U.S. Tech Leaders ETF
XIDV31.670.09
+0.29%
Franklin Intl Div Mltplr Idx ETF
EVF5.620.01
+0.18%
Eaton Vance Senior Income Trust
EFAX47.90-0.15
-0.30%
SPDR® MSCI EAFE Fssl Ful Free RsrvETF

ARES and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARES has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ARES jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARES
1D Price
Change %
ARES100%
+3.13%
KKR - ARES
88%
Closely correlated
+1.31%
OWL - ARES
86%
Closely correlated
-1.43%
CG - ARES
84%
Closely correlated
+1.83%
TPG - ARES
84%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
APO - ARES
83%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
More