ARES
Price
$137.63
Change
+$0.78 (+0.57%)
Updated
Aug 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
30.86B
73 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OWL
Price
$11.65
Change
-$0.22 (-1.85%)
Updated
Aug 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
18.51B
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ARES vs OWL

ARES vs OWL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Ares Management Corporation (ARES) vs. Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Ares Management Corporation (ARES) and Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) are both leading alternative asset managers focused on private credit, real assets, and related strategies, making them direct peers in the growing alternatives sector.
  • Recent market activity shows both stocks experiencing pressure amid broader interest rate volatility and shifts in investor sentiment toward private markets, with year-to-date performance reflecting sector-wide challenges.
  • Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) reported first-quarter 2026 assets under management (AUM) reaching $315 billion, supported by fundraising momentum despite some earnings variability.
  • Ares Management Corporation (ARES) maintains a diversified platform with emphasis on credit and private equity, showing relative stability in fee-related earnings compared to peers in recent periods.
  • Sector exposure for both centers on alternatives, where durable capital bases and fundraising success serve as key differentiators amid economic uncertainty.
  • Market sentiment remains cautious for both, influenced by redemption pressures in private credit funds and macroeconomic factors affecting deployment and returns.

Introduction

Alternative asset managers Ares Management Corporation (ARES) and Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) operate in overlapping segments of private credit, real assets, and strategic capital, attracting attention from institutional investors, wealth managers, and traders seeking exposure to non-traditional investments. This comparison examines their business models, recent performance trends, and market positioning to help market participants evaluate relative strengths in the current environment. Investors focused on fee-related earnings growth, AUM expansion, and resilience to interest rate fluctuations may find the analysis relevant for portfolio allocation decisions.

Ares Management Corporation (ARES) Overview and Recent Performance

Ares Management Corporation (ARES) is a global alternative asset manager with a diversified platform spanning credit, private equity, and real assets. The firm benefits from a scaled business model that generates recurring fee income from a broad client base. In recent weeks, the stock has reflected broader sector dynamics, including sensitivity to interest rate expectations and capital deployment trends. Performance has been shaped by steady fundraising and stable fee-related earnings, though market volatility has contributed to price fluctuations. Investor sentiment has been influenced by the firm’s ability to maintain margins amid competitive pressures in private markets.

Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) Overview and Recent Performance

Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) is an alternative asset manager emphasizing credit, real assets, and GP strategic capital platforms. As of March 31, 2026, the company reported $315 billion in AUM, driven by diversified fundraising across its three main strategies. Recent market activity includes first-quarter 2026 results that highlighted fee-related earnings growth alongside some variability in net investment income. Stock behavior in recent weeks has been affected by redemption activity in certain private credit vehicles and wider market caution, leading to tempered sentiment despite ongoing capital raising efforts.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating strong alignment with prevailing market conditions, consistent risk-adjusted returns, and robust statistical profiles earn placement in this section. Available bots span diverse trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and ticker sets, with performance metrics including win rates, profit factors, and drawdown statistics that vary widely by bot. This variety allows users to explore options suited to different risk tolerances and market views. Review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed statistics and strategy overviews.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Ares Management Corporation (ARES) and Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) share a focus on alternative investments but differ in platform emphasis and scale. Ares Management Corporation (ARES) maintains broader diversification across credit and private equity, potentially offering more balanced exposure to varying market cycles. Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) has concentrated growth in real assets and GP strategic capital alongside its credit franchise, supporting recent AUM expansion to $315 billion. Recent momentum favors fee-related earnings stability at Ares Management Corporation (ARES), while Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) has shown notable fundraising success offset by redemption pressures in select funds. Risk factors include interest rate sensitivity and liquidity dynamics for both, with sector exposure centered on private markets that reward durable capital bases. Market sentiment reflects shared challenges from macroeconomic uncertainty, creating trade-offs between Ares Management Corporation’s (ARES) diversification and Blue Owl Capital Inc.’s (OWL) specialized platform growth.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in fee-related earnings, AUM stability, and relative positioning amid sector volatility, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a probabilistic edge to Ares Management Corporation (ARES). Its diversified platform appears to support more consistent performance metrics in recent market activity compared to peers facing targeted redemption pressures. This assessment remains probabilistic and subject to evolving catalysts including fundraising outcomes and interest rate developments.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ARES vs. OWL commentary
Aug 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARES is a StrongBuy and OWL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 10, 2026
Stock price -- (ARES: $136.85 vs. OWL: $11.87)
Brand notoriety: ARES and OWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARES: 59% vs. OWL: 155%
Market capitalization -- ARES: $30.86B vs. OWL: $18.51B
ARES [@Investment Managers] is valued at $30.86B. OWL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $18.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $175.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARES’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOWL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ARES’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OWL is a better buy in the long-term than ARES.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ARES’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OWL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ARES’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OWL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ARES and OWL are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ARES (@Investment Managers) experienced а +6.84% price change this week, while OWL (@Investment Managers) price change was +15.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

ARES is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

OWL is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.76% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ARES($30.9B) has a higher market cap than OWL($18.5B). OWL has higher P/E ratio than ARES: OWL (98.92) vs ARES (62.78). ARES YTD gains are higher at: -13.314 vs. OWL (-17.067). ARES has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.23B vs. OWL (941M). OWL has less debt than ARES: OWL (4.35B) vs ARES (14.1B). ARES has higher revenues than OWL: ARES (5.91B) vs OWL (2.99B).
ARESOWLARES / OWL
Capitalization30.9B18.5B167%
EBITDA2.23B941M237%
Gain YTD-13.314-17.06778%
P/E Ratio62.7898.9263%
Revenue5.91B2.99B198%
Total CashN/A169M-
Total Debt14.1B4.35B325%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ARES: Fundamental Ratings
ARES
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
35
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
54
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
92
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARESOWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ARES
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OWL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INTJ3.290.40
+13.84%
Intelligent Group Limited
FWRD19.351.55
+8.71%
Forward Air Corp
SITM725.2837.78
+5.50%
SiTime Corp
BYFC11.130.50
+4.70%
Broadway Financial Corp
CLDX41.710.15
+0.36%
Celldex Therapeutics