ARGT vs SUPV
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARGT is a Buy and SUPV is a Sell.
SUPV | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 56 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 95 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ARGT | SUPV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 86% | 8 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 81% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GEMIX | 23.58 | -0.07 | -0.30% |
| Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Eq Instl | |||
| TFCCX | 20.17 | -0.10 | -0.49% |
| Touchstone Large Cap C | |||
| JAWGX | 72.73 | -1.12 | -1.52% |
| Janus Henderson VIT Global Rsrch Instl | |||
| IAFMX | 17.98 | -0.39 | -2.12% |
| F/m Investments Large Cap Focused Inv | |||
| FAGOX | 169.68 | -3.72 | -2.15% |
| Fidelity Advisor Growth Opps M | |||
ARGT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARGT has been closely correlated with BBAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ARGT jumps, then BBAR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ARGT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARGT | 100% | +0.97% | ||
| BBAR - ARGT | 80% Closely correlated | +1.31% | ||
| GGAL - ARGT | 80% Closely correlated | +2.89% | ||
| PAM - ARGT | 80% Closely correlated | +0.71% | ||
| BMA - ARGT | 79% Closely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| SUPV - ARGT | 79% Closely correlated | +2.31% | ||
More | ||||
SUPV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SUPV has been closely correlated with BBAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SUPV jumps, then BBAR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SUPV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUPV | 100% | +2.31% | ||
| BBAR - SUPV | 87% Closely correlated | +1.31% | ||
| GGAL - SUPV | 87% Closely correlated | +2.89% | ||
| BMA - SUPV | 86% Closely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| SBNY - SUPV | 35% Loosely correlated | +3.13% | ||
| OBT - SUPV | 30% Poorly correlated | -3.27% | ||
More | ||||