ARHS
Price
$8.41
Change
+$0.31 (+3.83%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.19B
40 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RH
Price
$159.04
Change
-$0.88 (-0.55%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
3.01B
68 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ARHS vs RH

ARHS vs RH Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Arhaus (ARHS) vs. RH (RH) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Arhaus (ARHS) and RH (RH) operate in the premium home furnishings retail sector, with Arhaus (ARHS) focusing on omni-channel accessibility and RH (RH) emphasizing luxury gallery experiences.
  • Recent market activity shows Arhaus (ARHS) delivering record Q1 2026 revenue amid comparable sales pressure, while RH (RH) prepares for earnings amid broader housing market softness.
  • Year-to-date performance favors Arhaus (ARHS) with stronger gains relative to RH (RH), though both stocks exhibit volatility tied to consumer spending trends.
  • Market capitalization places Arhaus (ARHS) as a smaller-cap name (~$900 million range) compared to RH (RH) (~$2.8 billion range), influencing liquidity and risk profiles.
  • Sector exposure to discretionary home goods links both to economic cycles, interest rates, and housing data, creating shared but differentiated risk factors.
  • Relative momentum in recent weeks highlights Arhaus (ARHS) resilience in revenue metrics versus RH (RH) positioning ahead of its upcoming quarterly report.

Introduction

Investors and traders evaluating opportunities in the specialty retail sector often compare companies with overlapping exposure to consumer discretionary spending on home furnishings. Arhaus (ARHS) and RH (RH) represent two distinct approaches within this space, making their stock comparison relevant for those assessing relative performance, business model differences, and positioning in a fluctuating macroeconomic environment. This analysis appeals to portfolio managers, swing traders, and long-term investors seeking objective insights into how these names have responded to recent market conditions without favoring one over the other.

Arhaus Overview and Recent Performance

Arhaus (ARHS) operates as a lifestyle brand and omni-channel retailer of premium home furnishings, including furniture, lighting, textiles, and decor. In recent weeks, the stock has reflected mixed sentiment following the company’s Q1 2026 earnings, which highlighted record net revenue of $314 million despite year-over-year declines in comparable written and delivered sales. Broader market activity shows resilience in top-line growth amid challenging consumer demand, with the share price trading in a range influenced by macroeconomic headwinds affecting housing-related purchases. Performance metrics indicate notable year-to-date gains relative to broader benchmarks, though longer-term returns remain tempered by sector volatility.

RH Overview and Recent Performance

RH (RH) functions as a curator of design and luxury lifestyle products through retail galleries, source books, and digital platforms. Recent market activity positions the stock ahead of its Q1 2026 earnings release scheduled for mid-June, with trading reflecting sensitivity to housing market dynamics and consumer spending patterns. Over recent weeks, price behavior has shown fluctuations within a wider 52-week range, supported by the company’s established presence in the higher-end segment. Performance data point to more moderate year-to-date movement compared with peers, consistent with ongoing adjustments to inventory and demand signals in the luxury furnishings category.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available across the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics tailored to current market conditions. Only the most suitable and top-ranked bots earn placement in the trending section, which features a range of win rates, profit factors, and drawdown metrics that can span from conservative low-volatility approaches to more aggressive momentum-driven styles. All AI trading bots differ in their underlying algorithms, risk parameters, and ticker universes. Traders interested in automated strategies for stocks like Arhaus (ARHS) or RH (RH) can explore the full curated list at the Trending AI Robots page.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Arhaus (ARHS) employs a broader omni-channel model that blends showrooms with online accessibility, potentially offering greater reach during periods of cautious consumer behavior. In contrast, RH (RH) concentrates on experiential luxury galleries and curated collections, which can command premium pricing but may face sharper swings with discretionary spending. Recent momentum favors Arhaus (ARHS) on revenue milestones, while RH (RH) maintains a larger market capitalization that supports greater analyst coverage and liquidity. Both face similar risk factors tied to interest-rate sensitivity and housing data, yet Arhaus (ARHS) exhibits higher beta characteristics in recent trading. Sector sentiment remains cautious for home furnishings overall, creating trade-offs between Arhaus (ARHS)’s growth trajectory and RH (RH)’s scale advantages.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including recent revenue consistency for Arhaus (ARHS) and relative year-to-date positioning, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to Arhaus (ARHS) over RH (RH) in trend-stability assessments. This edge reflects stronger top-line delivery amid shared sector pressures, though outcomes remain subject to upcoming earnings and broader economic data. The assessment uses probabilistic language tied to available performance differentials rather than definitive forecasts.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ARHS vs. RH commentary
Jun 27, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARHS is a StrongBuy and RH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2026
Stock price -- (ARHS: $8.41 vs. RH: $159.04)
Brand notoriety: ARHS: Not notable vs. RH: Notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARHS: 175% vs. RH: 289%
Market capitalization -- ARHS: $1.19B vs. RH: $3.01B
ARHS [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $1.19B. RH’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $3.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $52.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $4.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARHS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ARHS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ARHS is a better buy in the long-term than RH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ARHS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ARHS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ARHS and RH are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ARHS (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +15.84% price change this week, while RH (@Specialty Stores) price change was +7.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -1.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

ARHS is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

RH is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-1.03% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RH($3.01B) has a higher market cap than ARHS($1.19B). RH has higher P/E ratio than ARHS: RH (28.32) vs ARHS (14.79). RH YTD gains are higher at: -11.225 vs. ARHS (-21.279). RH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 544M vs. ARHS (178M). ARHS has more cash in the bank: 177M vs. RH (41.2M). ARHS has less debt than RH: ARHS (600M) vs RH (3.97B). RH has higher revenues than ARHS: RH (3.44B) vs ARHS (1.38B).
ARHSRHARHS / RH
Capitalization1.19B3.01B40%
EBITDA178M544M33%
Gain YTD-21.279-11.225190%
P/E Ratio14.7928.3252%
Revenue1.38B3.44B40%
Total Cash177M41.2M430%
Total Debt600M3.97B15%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RH: Fundamental Ratings
RH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
68
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
33
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
84
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARHSRH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ARHS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SRVR32.600.10
+0.31%
Pacer Data & Infrastructure Rl EsttETF
LCR39.520.05
+0.13%
Leuthold Core ETF
BRCE28.500.02
+0.08%
MFS Blended Research Core Equity ETF
GMUB51.44-0.02
-0.04%
Goldman Sachs Municipal Income ETF
TMSL43.12-0.35
-0.81%
T. Rowe Price Small-Mid Cap ETF

ARHS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARHS has been loosely correlated with RH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ARHS jumps, then RH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARHS
1D Price
Change %
ARHS100%
+3.83%
RH - ARHS
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.55%
WSM - ARHS
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.36%
FND - ARHS
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.21%
CARS - ARHS
54%
Loosely correlated
+5.81%
HVT - ARHS
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.67%
More

RH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RH has been loosely correlated with FND. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RH jumps, then FND could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RH
1D Price
Change %
RH100%
-0.55%
FND - RH
66%
Loosely correlated
+2.21%
WSM - RH
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.36%
ARHS - RH
62%
Loosely correlated
+3.83%
CPRT - RH
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.66%
HVT - RH
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.67%
More