This comparison examines ARHS and WSM, two specialty retailers in the home furnishings space. Both companies navigate comparable demand drivers, including housing trends and discretionary consumer spending. The analysis appeals to traders and investors seeking to evaluate relative performance, momentum shifts, and positioning within the consumer discretionary sector. It provides a factual overview of recent market activity without forecasts, helping market participants assess how these equities have responded to shared economic conditions over recent weeks.
Arhaus, Inc. (ARHS) specializes in premium, design-focused furniture and home décor through showrooms and digital channels. In recent market activity, the stock experienced notable upward movement following its second-quarter 2026 earnings release in early August. Revenue reached $384.9 million, reflecting a 7.4% year-over-year increase and exceeding consensus estimates. The company also raised its full-year net income outlook, contributing to improved sentiment. Broader influences include ongoing housing market recovery signals and competitive positioning in the luxury segment, though the smaller market capitalization has contributed to elevated price fluctuations compared with larger peers.
Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) manages a portfolio of premium home brands including Williams Sonoma, Pottery Barn, and West Elm, serving customers through retail stores and e-commerce. Over recent weeks, the stock has maintained strong year-to-date gains exceeding 34%, outperforming broader market benchmarks. Multiple analyst firms have raised price targets in anticipation of the company’s second-quarter 2026 results, scheduled for release on August 26. Performance has been supported by consistent brand strength and operational scale, with the larger market capitalization providing relative stability amid sector-wide influences such as consumer spending patterns.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates top-performing automated trading systems from hundreds of available AI trading bots that execute strategies across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions, consistent returns, and suitable risk profiles earn placement in this section. Available bots span diverse trading styles, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker sets, with many reporting win rates above 60% and varying drawdown levels in backtested or live environments. This selection process highlights bots optimized for current volatility and trend environments. Traders can explore the full range of options on the Trending AI Robots page to identify systems matching specific objectives.
ARHS and WSM share exposure to the home furnishings sector yet differ markedly in scale and execution. ARHS operates with a smaller market capitalization and higher sensitivity to earnings surprises, as evidenced by its recent post-report surge. In contrast, WSM benefits from greater diversification across brands and a larger operational footprint, contributing to steadier price action and more frequent analyst coverage. Growth drivers for both center on housing recovery and premium product demand, though ARHS faces relatively higher execution risk tied to its concentrated showroom model. Market sentiment has favored WSM’s consistency, while ARHS has shown sharper but shorter-term momentum shifts. Risk factors include macroeconomic sensitivity for both, with ARHS exhibiting greater volatility in recent periods.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, analyst support, and relative positioning, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to WSM. Its demonstrated stability, stronger year-to-date performance, and upcoming earnings catalyst provide a more consistent profile within the current market environment compared with ARHS’s higher-volatility recovery signals. This assessment reflects data-driven evaluation rather than certainty and remains subject to ongoing market developments.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| ARHS | WSM | ARHS / WSM | |
| Capitalization | 1.15B | 26.6B | 4% |
| EBITDA | 189M | 1.77B | 11% |
| Gain YTD | -24.181 | 28.007 | -86% |
| P/E Ratio | 16.22 | 23.20 | 70% |
| Revenue | 1.41B | 8.01B | 18% |
| Total Cash | 226M | 1.03B | 22% |
| Total Debt | 609M | 1.53B | 40% |
WSM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 14 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 21 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 20 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ARHS | WSM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 30 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 65% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ARHS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while WSM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ARHS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WSM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ARHS (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -7.22% price change this week, while WSM (@Specialty Stores) price change was -0.52% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -4.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.74%.
ARHS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
WSM is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.
The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARHS has been loosely correlated with RH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ARHS jumps, then RH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ARHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARHS | 100% | +2.02% | ||
| RH - ARHS | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| WSM - ARHS | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.11% | ||
| FND - ARHS | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| CARS - ARHS | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.75% | ||
| HVT - ARHS | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.06% | ||
More | ||||