ARKK
Price
$84.76
Change
+$1.18 (+1.41%)
Updated
Sep 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
6.45B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IWP
Price
$136.99
Change
-$1.01 (-0.73%)
Updated
Sep 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
19.37B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ARKK vs IWP

ARKK vs IWP Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 02, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) vs. iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP)

Key Takeaways

  • ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) is an actively managed thematic fund focused on disruptive innovation across multiple sectors, while iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) is a passive index tracker targeting U.S. mid-cap growth stocks.
  • ARKK typically holds 35-55 securities with concentrated positions in high-conviction names, resulting in higher potential volatility compared to IWP’s broader diversification across 265-280 holdings.
  • Expense ratios differ significantly, with ARKK at 0.75% versus IWP at 0.23%, reflecting the active management premium versus the lower-cost passive structure.
  • Sector exposures overlap in technology and healthcare but diverge in emphasis, with ARKK showing stronger thematic tilts toward emerging technologies and IWP maintaining balanced mid-cap growth characteristics.
  • Both ETFs provide growth-oriented equity exposure but serve distinct investor objectives: concentrated innovation bets versus systematic mid-cap participation.
  • Liquidity profiles favor established passive funds like IWP for broader market access, while ARKK offers specialized thematic liquidity within its niche.

Introduction

ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) represent two distinct approaches to growth equity investing. ARKK pursues active, high-conviction exposure to disruptive innovation themes, while IWP delivers systematic access to U.S. mid-cap growth companies through index replication. These ETFs do not compete directly but offer complementary or alternative strategies for investors seeking growth exposure beyond large-cap benchmarks. The comparison highlights structural differences that influence risk, cost, and positioning in varying market environments.

ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) Overview

ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) is an actively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks long-term capital growth by investing primarily in domestic and foreign equity securities tied to disruptive innovation themes. The fund typically maintains 35-55 holdings, emphasizing high-conviction positions in companies across genomics, automation, artificial intelligence, and financial technology. Top holdings often include names such as TSLA, TEM, CRSP, COIN, and SHOP, with significant allocations to technology, healthcare, and consumer discretionary sectors. The expense ratio stands at 0.75%. As a non-diversified, actively managed vehicle, ARKK employs discretionary rebalancing driven by fundamental research rather than mechanical index rules, resulting in elevated active share and potential for concentrated risk.

iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) Overview

iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) is a passively managed fund designed to track the performance of the Russell Midcap Growth Index, which measures U.S. mid-capitalization equities exhibiting growth characteristics. The ETF holds approximately 265-280 securities, providing broad diversification across mid-cap growth names. Representative top holdings include companies such as VRT, HWM, NET, and DDOG, with allocations spanning information technology, industrials, healthcare, and consumer discretionary sectors. The expense ratio is 0.23%. IWP utilizes representative sampling for index replication and quarterly rebalancing aligned with index methodology, delivering cost-efficient exposure to the mid-cap growth segment without active security selection.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The broader equity environment continues to favor growth-oriented strategies amid ongoing innovation cycles in artificial intelligence, digital infrastructure, and biotechnology. Mid-cap growth segments benefit from earnings expansion potential and sector rotation dynamics, while thematic innovation funds face heightened sensitivity to regulatory developments, capital allocation shifts, and macroeconomic factors such as interest rate expectations. Both ARKK and IWP operate within technology and healthcare ecosystems where capital flows have supported expansion in recent market cycles, though active thematic approaches encounter greater dispersion in outcomes compared to systematic mid-cap benchmarks.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, ARKK’s active thematic positioning has produced more pronounced swings tied to the performance of its concentrated holdings and innovation themes. IWP has delivered steadier participation in mid-cap growth trends through its diversified index methodology. Relative positioning reflects differing risk profiles: ARKK’s higher expense ratio and active mandate align with potential for outsized returns during favorable innovation environments, whereas IWP’s lower costs and broader holdings support more consistent exposure across earnings cycles and sector rotations. Volatility differentials remain a key differentiator, with the active fund exhibiting greater sensitivity to individual security and thematic developments.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into ETFs like ARKK and IWP may find the platform useful for refining screening criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including lower expense ratio, broader diversification, and systematic mid-cap growth exposure, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign higher probabilistic favorability to iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) for investors prioritizing cost efficiency and consistent positioning within established growth segments. ARKK retains relevance for those seeking concentrated thematic exposure, though its active mandate introduces greater variability in outcomes.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ARKK vs. IWP commentary
Sep 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARKK is a Hold and IWP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWP has more net assets: 19.4B vs. ARKK (6.45B). ARKK has a higher annual dividend yield than IWP: ARKK (10.140) vs IWP (0.179). ARKK was incepted earlier than IWP: ARKK (12 years) vs IWP (25 years). IWP (0.23) has a lower expense ratio than ARKK (0.75). ARKK has a higher turnover IWP (24.00) vs IWP (24.00).
ARKKIWPARKK / IWP
Gain YTD10.1400.1795,676%
Net Assets6.45B19.4B33%
Total Expense Ratio0.750.23326%
Turnover43.0024.00179%
Yield0.000.35-
Fund Existence12 years25 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARKKIWP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
ARKK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IWP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HERZ16.240.03
+0.19%
Herzfeld Credit Income Fund Inc.
IBCA24.53N/A
N/A
iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Corp ETF
RCTR32.89-0.90
-2.66%
First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF
DTCR27.22-1.04
-3.68%
Global X Data Center & Dgtl Infrs ETF
CHPS79.93-4.91
-5.79%
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Eq ETF

ARKK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARKK has been closely correlated with ACHR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ARKK jumps, then ACHR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARKK
1D Price
Change %
ARKK100%
+1.36%
ACHR - ARKK
68%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
SE - ARKK
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.30%
FIRY - ARKK
60%
Loosely correlated
+3.52%
DDD - ARKK
56%
Loosely correlated
-3.31%
DNA - ARKK
55%
Loosely correlated
+3.85%
More

IWP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWP has been loosely correlated with ONTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IWP jumps, then ONTO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IWP
1D Price
Change %
IWP100%
-0.75%
ONTO - IWP
64%
Loosely correlated
-11.07%
FIX - IWP
60%
Loosely correlated
-6.39%
DAL - IWP
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
ROK - IWP
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.23%
BWXT - IWP
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.06%
More