ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) represent two distinct approaches to growth equity investing. ARKK pursues active, high-conviction exposure to disruptive innovation themes, while IWP delivers systematic access to U.S. mid-cap growth companies through index replication. These ETFs do not compete directly but offer complementary or alternative strategies for investors seeking growth exposure beyond large-cap benchmarks. The comparison highlights structural differences that influence risk, cost, and positioning in varying market environments.
ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) is an actively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks long-term capital growth by investing primarily in domestic and foreign equity securities tied to disruptive innovation themes. The fund typically maintains 35-55 holdings, emphasizing high-conviction positions in companies across genomics, automation, artificial intelligence, and financial technology. Top holdings often include names such as TSLA, TEM, CRSP, COIN, and SHOP, with significant allocations to technology, healthcare, and consumer discretionary sectors. The expense ratio stands at 0.75%. As a non-diversified, actively managed vehicle, ARKK employs discretionary rebalancing driven by fundamental research rather than mechanical index rules, resulting in elevated active share and potential for concentrated risk.
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) is a passively managed fund designed to track the performance of the Russell Midcap Growth Index, which measures U.S. mid-capitalization equities exhibiting growth characteristics. The ETF holds approximately 265-280 securities, providing broad diversification across mid-cap growth names. Representative top holdings include companies such as VRT, HWM, NET, and DDOG, with allocations spanning information technology, industrials, healthcare, and consumer discretionary sectors. The expense ratio is 0.23%. IWP utilizes representative sampling for index replication and quarterly rebalancing aligned with index methodology, delivering cost-efficient exposure to the mid-cap growth segment without active security selection.
The broader equity environment continues to favor growth-oriented strategies amid ongoing innovation cycles in artificial intelligence, digital infrastructure, and biotechnology. Mid-cap growth segments benefit from earnings expansion potential and sector rotation dynamics, while thematic innovation funds face heightened sensitivity to regulatory developments, capital allocation shifts, and macroeconomic factors such as interest rate expectations. Both ARKK and IWP operate within technology and healthcare ecosystems where capital flows have supported expansion in recent market cycles, though active thematic approaches encounter greater dispersion in outcomes compared to systematic mid-cap benchmarks.
In recent market cycles, ARKK’s active thematic positioning has produced more pronounced swings tied to the performance of its concentrated holdings and innovation themes. IWP has delivered steadier participation in mid-cap growth trends through its diversified index methodology. Relative positioning reflects differing risk profiles: ARKK’s higher expense ratio and active mandate align with potential for outsized returns during favorable innovation environments, whereas IWP’s lower costs and broader holdings support more consistent exposure across earnings cycles and sector rotations. Volatility differentials remain a key differentiator, with the active fund exhibiting greater sensitivity to individual security and thematic developments.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into ETFs like ARKK and IWP may find the platform useful for refining screening criteria.
Based on observable structural factors including lower expense ratio, broader diversification, and systematic mid-cap growth exposure, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign higher probabilistic favorability to iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) for investors prioritizing cost efficiency and consistent positioning within established growth segments. ARKK retains relevance for those seeking concentrated thematic exposure, though its active mandate introduces greater variability in outcomes.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| ARKK | IWP | ARKK / IWP | |
| Gain YTD | 10.140 | 0.179 | 5,676% |
| Net Assets | 6.45B | 19.4B | 33% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.23 | 326% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 24.00 | 179% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.35 | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 25 years | - |
| ARKK | IWP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 90% | 19 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 88% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HERZ | 16.24 | 0.03 | +0.19% |
| Herzfeld Credit Income Fund Inc. | |||
| IBCA | 24.53 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Corp ETF | |||
| RCTR | 32.89 | -0.90 | -2.66% |
| First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF | |||
| DTCR | 27.22 | -1.04 | -3.68% |
| Global X Data Center & Dgtl Infrs ETF | |||
| CHPS | 79.93 | -4.91 | -5.79% |
| Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Eq ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARKK has been closely correlated with ACHR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ARKK jumps, then ACHR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ARKK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARKK | 100% | +1.36% | ||
| ACHR - ARKK | 68% Closely correlated | -1.25% | ||
| SE - ARKK | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.30% | ||
| FIRY - ARKK | 60% Loosely correlated | +3.52% | ||
| DDD - ARKK | 56% Loosely correlated | -3.31% | ||
| DNA - ARKK | 55% Loosely correlated | +3.85% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWP has been loosely correlated with ONTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IWP jumps, then ONTO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWP | 100% | -0.75% | ||
| ONTO - IWP | 64% Loosely correlated | -11.07% | ||
| FIX - IWP | 60% Loosely correlated | -6.39% | ||
| DAL - IWP | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| ROK - IWP | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.23% | ||
| BWXT - IWP | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.06% | ||
More | ||||