It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ARLUF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRRR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ARLUF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RRR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ARLUF (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -6.77% price change this week, while RRR (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was +8.20% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +58.77%.
RRR is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.
Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.
ARLUF | RRR | ARLUF / RRR | |
Capitalization | 17.3B | 3.63B | 477% |
EBITDA | 2.12B | 694M | 306% |
Gain YTD | 0.713 | 1.060 | 67% |
P/E Ratio | 24.04 | 20.85 | 115% |
Revenue | 5.91B | 1.72B | 343% |
Total Cash | 1.68B | 138M | 1,219% |
Total Debt | 3.52B | 3.33B | 106% |
ARLUF | RRR | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 44 Fair valued | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 27 | 24 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 78 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | 43 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 95 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RRR's Valuation (27) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as ARLUF (44) in the null industry. This means that RRR’s stock grew similarly to ARLUF’s over the last 12 months.
RRR's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as ARLUF (27) in the null industry. This means that RRR’s stock grew similarly to ARLUF’s over the last 12 months.
RRR's SMR Rating (12) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for ARLUF (78) in the null industry. This means that RRR’s stock grew significantly faster than ARLUF’s over the last 12 months.
ARLUF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as RRR (60) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that ARLUF’s stock grew similarly to RRR’s over the last 12 months.
ARLUF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as RRR (43) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that ARLUF’s stock grew similarly to RRR’s over the last 12 months.
ARLUF | RRR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 12 days ago76% | 12 days ago87% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 12 days ago46% | 12 days ago79% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 12 days ago48% | 12 days ago69% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 12 days ago64% | 12 days ago69% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 12 days ago45% | 12 days ago73% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 14 days ago74% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago49% | 12 days ago68% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 12 days ago63% | 12 days ago84% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago66% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
FZACX | 38.68 | 0.44 | +1.15% |
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock Z | |||
VEMRX | 92.22 | 0.58 | +0.63% |
Vanguard Emerging Mkts Stock Idx InsPlus | |||
PEMYX | 14.37 | 0.08 | +0.56% |
Putnam Emerging Markets Equity Y | |||
EPLCX | 21.88 | 0.11 | +0.51% |
NYLI Epoch U.S. Equity Yield Class I | |||
TPYIX | 8.18 | 0.04 | +0.49% |
Touchstone Sands Capital Intl Gr Eq I |
A.I.dvisor tells us that ARLUF and GMVHY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ARLUF and GMVHY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ARLUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ARLUF | 100% | N/A | ||
GMVHY - ARLUF | 21% Poorly correlated | +6.23% | ||
IGT - ARLUF | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.23% | ||
CZR - ARLUF | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.19% | ||
RRR - ARLUF | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.02% | ||
RSI - ARLUF | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.60% | ||
More |