ARMK
Price
$39.11
Change
-$0.14 (-0.36%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
10.28B
78 days until earnings call
ULS
Price
$63.17
Change
-$0.16 (-0.25%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
12.69B
71 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ARMK vs ULS

Header iconARMK vs ULS Comparison
Open Charts ARMK vs ULSBanner chart's image
ARAMARK
Price$39.11
Change-$0.14 (-0.36%)
Volume$956.09K
Capitalization10.28B
UL Solutions
Price$63.17
Change-$0.16 (-0.25%)
Volume$509.64K
Capitalization12.69B
ARMK vs ULS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ARMK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ULS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ARMK vs. ULS commentary
Sep 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARMK is a Hold and ULS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 01, 2025
Stock price -- (ARMK: $39.11 vs. ULS: $63.17)
Brand notoriety: ARMK and ULS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Office Equipment/Supplies industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARMK: 47% vs. ULS: 58%
Market capitalization -- ARMK: $10.28B vs. ULS: $12.69B
ARMK [@Office Equipment/Supplies] is valued at $10.28B. ULS’s [@Office Equipment/Supplies] market capitalization is $12.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry ranges from $89.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry is $7.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARMK’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileULS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ARMK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ULS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ARMK is a better buy in the long-term than ULS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ARMK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ULS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ARMK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ULS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ULS is a better buy in the short-term than ARMK.

Price Growth

ARMK (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а -2.35% price change this week, while ULS (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was -3.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

ARMK is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.

ULS is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Office Equipment/Supplies (-1.19% weekly)

The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ULS($12.7B) has a higher market cap than ARMK($10.3B). ULS has higher P/E ratio than ARMK: ULS (38.99) vs ARMK (28.76). ULS YTD gains are higher at: 27.450 vs. ARMK (5.676). ARMK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.31B vs. ULS (657M). ULS has less debt than ARMK: ULS (843M) vs ARMK (6.62B). ARMK has higher revenues than ULS: ARMK (17.9B) vs ULS (2.95B).
ARMKULSARMK / ULS
Capitalization10.3B12.7B81%
EBITDA1.31B657M199%
Gain YTD5.67627.45021%
P/E Ratio28.7638.9974%
Revenue17.9B2.95B607%
Total Cash501MN/A-
Total Debt6.62B843M785%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ARMK: Fundamental Ratings
ARMK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
20
SMR RATING
1..100
63
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
17
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARMKULS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ARMK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ULS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FGTAX28.85-0.17
-0.59%
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock A
VITSX154.86-0.98
-0.63%
Vanguard Total Stock Market Idx I
HESGX45.61-0.34
-0.74%
Horizon Defensive Core Investor
LSCGX22.26-0.19
-0.85%
Loomis Sayles Global Growth C
GGCIX132.15-1.67
-1.25%
Gabelli Growth I

ARMK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARMK has been loosely correlated with ULS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ARMK jumps, then ULS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARMK
1D Price
Change %
ARMK100%
-0.36%
ULS - ARMK
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
MSA - ARMK
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.32%
DNB - ARMK
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ARLO - ARMK
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.46%
EXPO - ARMK
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.18%
More

ULS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ULS has been loosely correlated with ARMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ULS jumps, then ARMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ULS
1D Price
Change %
ULS100%
-0.05%
ARMK - ULS
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.36%
RELX - ULS
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
CTAS - ULS
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
AZZ - ULS
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.83%
FA - ULS
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
More