Archrock, Inc. (AROC) and Kodiak Gas Services, Inc. (KGS) are mid‑stream energy infrastructure companies that specialize in natural‑gas compression. The pair is of interest to traders and investors tracking the energy sector’s response to fluctuating commodity prices, evolving ESG pressures, and the growing demand for reliable gas‑handling capacity. This comparison is tailored to both sector‑focused equity investors and quantitative traders who evaluate valuation, cash‑flow stability, and AI‑driven robot suitability.
Archrock, headquartered in Houston, Texas, operates two segments: Contract Operations (owned‑fleet compression) and Aftermarket Services (parts, maintenance, and overhaul). With a market‑capitalization of roughly $6.6 billion, the company generated about $1.5 billion in revenue over the trailing twelve months (TTM) and posted a net profit margin of ≈21%, delivering earnings per share (EPS) of $1.84. The balance sheet shows a Debt‑to‑Equity ratio near 1.6× and a beta of 0.93, indicating modest volatility relative to the S&P 500.
During the past few weeks the stock has risen approximately 1.5% after analysts at Stifel and Raymond James raised their price targets to $41–$46, citing “steady contract backlog” and “discipline in cost management.” Dividend payments of $0.88 per share (≈2.4% yield) have remained unchanged, reinforcing income‑focused investor appeal. Sentiment on Bloomberg and Reuters highlighted Archrock’s resilience amid a flattening natural‑gas price curve, with the consensus view that contract‑backed cash flow supports near‑term stability.
Kodiak Gas Services, based in The Woodlands, Texas, also runs two segments: Contract Services (compression, gas‑treating, cooling) and Other Services (construction, maintenance, parts sales). The firm’s market‑capitalization hovers around $6 billion, with TTM revenue of $1.31 billion. Net margins sit near 6%, and EPS is about $0.88. The company trades at a high PE multiple of roughly 80×, reflecting growth expectations that remain contested. Debt‑to‑Equity stands at ≈2.1×, and beta is close to 1.0, indicating market‑average volatility.
In the recent market cycle KGS experienced a modest price dip after a Q1 earnings release missed consensus EPS (actual $0.40 vs. $0.53 estimate). Nevertheless, the dividend of $1.96 per share (≈2.9% yield) persists, attracting yield hunters. Analysts at Goldman Sachs and BofA recently nudged price targets upward to $69–$70, pointing to the company’s “long‑term contract pipeline” and its role in emerging AI‑driven energy demand, though concerns over valuation and leverage tempered enthusiasm.
The Trending AI Robots page on Tickeron showcases a curated selection of the platform’s most effective AI trading bots. Tickeron maintains hundreds of bots that collectively trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies—ranging from high‑frequency momentum to longer‑term mean‑reversion. Only those bots demonstrating consistent performance metrics, suitable risk‑adjusted returns, and alignment with current market conditions earn a spot in the “Trending” section. Traders can explore bots with win rates between 55% and 70%, annualized Sharpe ratios above 1.2, and customizable timeframes from intraday to multi‑week horizons. The page invites users to trial the top‑ranked bots or subscribe for automated execution.
| Dimension | Archrock (AROC) | Kodiak Gas Services (KGS) |
|---|---|---|
| Core Business Model | Contract compression + aftermarket services | Contract compression + ancillary construction/maintenance services |
| Revenue (TTM) | ≈ $1.5 bn | ≈ $1.31 bn |
| Net Margin | ≈ 21% | ≈ 6% |
| PE Ratio (TTM) | ~20× | ~80× |
| Dividend Yield | 2.4% (stable) | 2.9% (higher but less secure) |
| Debt‑to‑Equity | 1.6× | 2.1× |
| Beta | 0.93 (slightly less volatile) | ≈1.0 (market‑average volatility) |
| Recent Catalysts | Analyst upgrades, contract backlog growth | Earnings miss, dividend continuity, AI‑energy narrative |
| Risk Factors | Commodity price exposure, contract renewal risk | High valuation, leverage, earnings volatility |
Based on observable metrics—steady earnings, lower valuation, stronger profit margins, and modest leverage—Tickeron’s AI models would currently assign a probability advantage to Archrock (AROC) over Kodiak Gas Services (KGS). The AI favors stocks that demonstrate consistent cash‑flow coverage and a PE ratio near sector averages, both characteristics that AROC exhibits. While KGS offers an attractive dividend, its elevated PE multiple and recent earnings shortfall increase model‑derived risk, nudging the AI’s recommendation toward Archrock for the present market backdrop.
“The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.” Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AROC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKGS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AROC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KGS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
AROC (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +4.93% price change this week, while KGS (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +2.12% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +112.96%.
AROC is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
KGS is expected to report earnings on Aug 17, 2026.
The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.
| AROC | KGS | AROC / KGS | |
| Capitalization | 6.67B | 7.14B | 94% |
| EBITDA | 870M | 567M | 153% |
| Gain YTD | 48.239 | 92.235 | 52% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.68 | 93.05 | 22% |
| Revenue | 1.52B | 1.32B | 115% |
| Total Cash | 4.46M | 94.4M | 5% |
| Total Debt | 2.39B | 2.84B | 84% |
AROC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| AROC | KGS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 38% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 62% | 7 days ago 42% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 82% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CRYPTO / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ROSE.X | 0.006540 | 0.000046 | +0.71% |
| Oasis cryptocurrency | |||
| AUD.X | 0.015700 | N/A | N/A |
| Aussie Digital cryptocurrency | |||
| DASH.X | 34.488106 | -0.179813 | -0.52% |
| Dash cryptocurrency | |||
| SPELL.X | 0.000116 | -0.000003 | -2.59% |
| Spell Token cryptocurrency | |||
| CITY.X | 0.385438 | -0.010274 | -2.60% |
| Manchester City Fan Token cryptocurrency | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AROC has been closely correlated with KGS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AROC jumps, then KGS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AROC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AROC | 100% | +3.00% | ||
| KGS - AROC | 73% Closely correlated | +2.23% | ||
| TTI - AROC | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.98% | ||
| NGS - AROC | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.92% | ||
| FTI - AROC | 46% Loosely correlated | +3.41% | ||
| DNOW - AROC | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.56% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KGS has been closely correlated with AROC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KGS jumps, then AROC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KGS | 100% | +2.23% | ||
| AROC - KGS | 73% Closely correlated | +3.00% | ||
| TTI - KGS | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.98% | ||
| NGS - KGS | 48% Loosely correlated | +2.92% | ||
| EFXT - KGS | 36% Loosely correlated | +6.92% | ||
| OII - KGS | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
More | ||||