AROC
Price
$39.13
Change
+$1.05 (+2.76%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:02 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.67B
42 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KGS
Price
$71.40
Change
+$0.68 (+0.96%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:11 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.14B
55 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AROC vs KGS

AROC vs KGS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Archrock (AROC) vs. Kodiak Gas Services (KGS) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • AROC trades at a modest price‑to‑earnings (PE) multiple (~20×) versus KGS’s elevated PE (~80×), indicating cheaper valuation for Archrock.
  • Both firms operate in the energy‑infrastructure segment, but Archrock focuses on contract compression services while KGS adds extensive “Other Services” (station construction, overhaul, parts sales).
  • AROC posted strong profit margins (≈21% net) and a solid dividend yield (~2.4%); KGS offers a higher yield (~2.9%) but its earnings margin is lower (≈6%).
  • Recent market sentiment favoured AROC after analyst upgrades, whereas KGS faced pressure from an earnings miss and a volatile valuation narrative.
  • Both stocks benefit from continued natural‑gas demand, yet Archrock’s lower leverage (Debt/Equity ~1.6×) provides a cushion compared with KGS’s higher leverage (~2.1×).

Introduction

Archrock, Inc. (AROC) and Kodiak Gas Services, Inc. (KGS) are mid‑stream energy infrastructure companies that specialize in natural‑gas compression. The pair is of interest to traders and investors tracking the energy sector’s response to fluctuating commodity prices, evolving ESG pressures, and the growing demand for reliable gas‑handling capacity. This comparison is tailored to both sector‑focused equity investors and quantitative traders who evaluate valuation, cash‑flow stability, and AI‑driven robot suitability.

AROC Overview and Recent Performance

Archrock, headquartered in Houston, Texas, operates two segments: Contract Operations (owned‑fleet compression) and Aftermarket Services (parts, maintenance, and overhaul). With a market‑capitalization of roughly $6.6 billion, the company generated about $1.5 billion in revenue over the trailing twelve months (TTM) and posted a net profit margin of ≈21%, delivering earnings per share (EPS) of $1.84. The balance sheet shows a Debt‑to‑Equity ratio near 1.6× and a beta of 0.93, indicating modest volatility relative to the S&P 500.

During the past few weeks the stock has risen approximately 1.5% after analysts at Stifel and Raymond James raised their price targets to $41–$46, citing “steady contract backlog” and “discipline in cost management.” Dividend payments of $0.88 per share (≈2.4% yield) have remained unchanged, reinforcing income‑focused investor appeal. Sentiment on Bloomberg and Reuters highlighted Archrock’s resilience amid a flattening natural‑gas price curve, with the consensus view that contract‑backed cash flow supports near‑term stability.

KGS Overview and Recent Performance

Kodiak Gas Services, based in The Woodlands, Texas, also runs two segments: Contract Services (compression, gas‑treating, cooling) and Other Services (construction, maintenance, parts sales). The firm’s market‑capitalization hovers around $6 billion, with TTM revenue of $1.31 billion. Net margins sit near 6%, and EPS is about $0.88. The company trades at a high PE multiple of roughly 80×, reflecting growth expectations that remain contested. Debt‑to‑Equity stands at ≈2.1×, and beta is close to 1.0, indicating market‑average volatility.

In the recent market cycle KGS experienced a modest price dip after a Q1 earnings release missed consensus EPS (actual $0.40 vs. $0.53 estimate). Nevertheless, the dividend of $1.96 per share (≈2.9% yield) persists, attracting yield hunters. Analysts at Goldman Sachs and BofA recently nudged price targets upward to $69–$70, pointing to the company’s “long‑term contract pipeline” and its role in emerging AI‑driven energy demand, though concerns over valuation and leverage tempered enthusiasm.

Trending AI Robots

The Trending AI Robots page on Tickeron showcases a curated selection of the platform’s most effective AI trading bots. Tickeron maintains hundreds of bots that collectively trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies—ranging from high‑frequency momentum to longer‑term mean‑reversion. Only those bots demonstrating consistent performance metrics, suitable risk‑adjusted returns, and alignment with current market conditions earn a spot in the “Trending” section. Traders can explore bots with win rates between 55% and 70%, annualized Sharpe ratios above 1.2, and customizable timeframes from intraday to multi‑week horizons. The page invites users to trial the top‑ranked bots or subscribe for automated execution.

Head-to-Head Comparison

DimensionArchrock (AROC)Kodiak Gas Services (KGS)
Core Business ModelContract compression + aftermarket servicesContract compression + ancillary construction/maintenance services
Revenue (TTM)≈ $1.5 bn≈ $1.31 bn
Net Margin≈ 21%≈ 6%
PE Ratio (TTM)~20×~80×
Dividend Yield2.4% (stable)2.9% (higher but less secure)
Debt‑to‑Equity1.6×2.1×
Beta0.93 (slightly less volatile)≈1.0 (market‑average volatility)
Recent CatalystsAnalyst upgrades, contract backlog growthEarnings miss, dividend continuity, AI‑energy narrative
Risk FactorsCommodity price exposure, contract renewal riskHigh valuation, leverage, earnings volatility

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable metrics—steady earnings, lower valuation, stronger profit margins, and modest leverage—Tickeron’s AI models would currently assign a probability advantage to Archrock (AROC) over Kodiak Gas Services (KGS). The AI favors stocks that demonstrate consistent cash‑flow coverage and a PE ratio near sector averages, both characteristics that AROC exhibits. While KGS offers an attractive dividend, its elevated PE multiple and recent earnings shortfall increase model‑derived risk, nudging the AI’s recommendation toward Archrock for the present market backdrop.

Disclaimer

“The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.” Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
AROC vs. KGS commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AROC is a Buy and KGS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (AROC: $38.08 vs. KGS: $70.72)
Brand notoriety: AROC and KGS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AROC: 94% vs. KGS: 108%
Market capitalization -- AROC: $6.67B vs. KGS: $7.14B
AROC [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $6.67B. KGS’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $7.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $71.69B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AROC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKGS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AROC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • KGS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, AROC is a better buy in the long-term than KGS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AROC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KGS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AROC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • KGS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KGS is a better buy in the short-term than AROC.

Price Growth

AROC (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +4.93% price change this week, while KGS (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +2.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +112.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

AROC is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

KGS is expected to report earnings on Aug 17, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-3.11% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KGS($7.14B) has a higher market cap than AROC($6.67B). KGS has higher P/E ratio than AROC: KGS (93.05) vs AROC (20.68). KGS YTD gains are higher at: 92.235 vs. AROC (48.239). AROC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 870M vs. KGS (567M). KGS has more cash in the bank: 94.4M vs. AROC (4.46M). AROC has less debt than KGS: AROC (2.39B) vs KGS (2.84B). AROC has higher revenues than KGS: AROC (1.52B) vs KGS (1.32B).
AROCKGSAROC / KGS
Capitalization6.67B7.14B94%
EBITDA870M567M153%
Gain YTD48.23992.23552%
P/E Ratio20.6893.0522%
Revenue1.52B1.32B115%
Total Cash4.46M94.4M5%
Total Debt2.39B2.84B84%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AROC: Fundamental Ratings
AROC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
21
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8
SMR RATING
1..100
42
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AROCKGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AROC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KGS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ROSE.X0.0065400.000046
+0.71%
Oasis cryptocurrency
AUD.X0.015700N/A
N/A
Aussie Digital cryptocurrency
DASH.X34.488106-0.179813
-0.52%
Dash cryptocurrency
SPELL.X0.000116-0.000003
-2.59%
Spell Token cryptocurrency
CITY.X0.385438-0.010274
-2.60%
Manchester City Fan Token cryptocurrency

AROC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AROC has been closely correlated with KGS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AROC jumps, then KGS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AROC
1D Price
Change %
AROC100%
+3.00%
KGS - AROC
73%
Closely correlated
+2.23%
TTI - AROC
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
NGS - AROC
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.92%
FTI - AROC
46%
Loosely correlated
+3.41%
DNOW - AROC
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.56%
More

KGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KGS has been closely correlated with AROC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KGS jumps, then AROC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGS
1D Price
Change %
KGS100%
+2.23%
AROC - KGS
73%
Closely correlated
+3.00%
TTI - KGS
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
NGS - KGS
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.92%
EFXT - KGS
36%
Loosely correlated
+6.92%
OII - KGS
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
More