AROW
Price
$23.75
Change
-$0.59 (-2.42%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
404.72M
10 days until earnings call
CZFS
Price
$55.91
Change
-$1.21 (-2.12%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
231.58M
6 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AROW vs CZFS

Header iconAROW vs CZFS Comparison
Open Charts AROW vs CZFSBanner chart's image
Arrow Financial
Price$23.75
Change-$0.59 (-2.42%)
Volume$74.6K
Capitalization404.72M
Citizens Financial Services
Price$55.91
Change-$1.21 (-2.12%)
Volume$7.76K
Capitalization231.58M
AROW vs CZFS Comparison Chart
Loading...
AROW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CZFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AROW vs. CZFS commentary
Apr 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AROW is a Hold and CZFS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 19, 2025
Stock price -- (AROW: $23.75 vs. CZFS: $55.91)
Brand notoriety: AROW and CZFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AROW: 197% vs. CZFS: 67%
Market capitalization -- AROW: $404.72M vs. CZFS: $231.58M
AROW [@Regional Banks] is valued at $404.72M. CZFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $231.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AROW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCZFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AROW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CZFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CZFS is a better buy in the long-term than AROW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AROW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CZFS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AROW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CZFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CZFS is a better buy in the short-term than AROW.

Price Growth

AROW (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.08% price change this week, while CZFS (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

AROW is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

CZFS is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AROW($405M) has a higher market cap than CZFS($232M). AROW has higher P/E ratio than CZFS: AROW (13.81) vs CZFS (11.92). CZFS YTD gains are higher at: -10.904 vs. AROW (-16.406). AROW has less debt than CZFS: AROW (51.6M) vs CZFS (322M). AROW has higher revenues than CZFS: AROW (134M) vs CZFS (91.9M).
AROWCZFSAROW / CZFS
Capitalization405M232M175%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-16.406-10.904150%
P/E Ratio13.8111.92116%
Revenue134M91.9M146%
Total Cash39.8MN/A-
Total Debt51.6M322M16%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AROW vs CZFS: Fundamental Ratings
AROW
CZFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1177
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7252
SMR RATING
1..100
1214
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6054
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3559
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CZFS's Valuation (45) in the null industry is in the same range as AROW (57) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CZFS’s stock grew similarly to AROW’s over the last 12 months.

CZFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as AROW (72) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CZFS’s stock grew similarly to AROW’s over the last 12 months.

AROW's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CZFS (14) in the null industry. This means that AROW’s stock grew similarly to CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

CZFS's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as AROW (60) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CZFS’s stock grew similarly to AROW’s over the last 12 months.

AROW's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CZFS (59) in the null industry. This means that AROW’s stock grew similarly to CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AROWCZFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AROW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CZFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HHHCX16.270.17
+1.06%
Hartford Schroders Emerging Mkts Eq C
VSFSX21.110.19
+0.91%
Federated Hermes Clover Small Value R6
BUISX12.720.07
+0.55%
Buffalo Small Cap Growth Institutional
TSMWX12.930.06
+0.47%
Nuveen Quant Small/Mid Cap Eq R6
TSGDX13.28-0.09
-0.67%
Transamerica Sustainable Growth Eq A

AROW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AROW has been closely correlated with NWBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AROW jumps, then NWBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AROW
1D Price
Change %
AROW100%
-2.42%
NWBI - AROW
87%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
PEBO - AROW
86%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
FMBH - AROW
86%
Closely correlated
+0.72%
FCF - AROW
86%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
CTBI - AROW
86%
Closely correlated
-0.78%
More

CZFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZFS has been closely correlated with BFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CZFS jumps, then BFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CZFS
1D Price
Change %
CZFS100%
-2.12%
BFC - CZFS
69%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
VBTX - CZFS
67%
Closely correlated
+1.40%
STEL - CZFS
67%
Closely correlated
+0.74%
AROW - CZFS
66%
Closely correlated
-2.42%
PFIS - CZFS
66%
Closely correlated
+1.07%
More