CZFS
Price
$77.52
Change
+$1.14 (+1.49%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
372.82M
88 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PFIS
Price
$70.36
Change
-$0.75 (-1.05%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
704.37M
74 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CZFS vs PFIS

CZFS vs PFIS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 28, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Citizens Financial Services (CZFS) vs. Peoples Financial Services (PFIS) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both CZFS and PFIS are Pennsylvania-based regional bank holding companies operating in overlapping geographic markets, yet they differ meaningfully in scale, valuation, and recent momentum.
  • PFIS commands a significantly larger market capitalization of approximately $703 million compared to CZFS at roughly $370 million, and also generates higher total revenue.
  • CZFS trades at a notably lower P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio of approximately 9.1 versus PFIS at roughly 12.0, suggesting a more value-oriented profile.
  • Year-to-date performance favors PFIS, which has posted a gain of approximately 44% compared to roughly 33% for CZFS, reflecting stronger upward momentum.
  • Both companies maintain consistent dividend programs, with PFIS offering a higher dividend yield of approximately 3.6% versus CZFS at roughly 2.7%.
  • CZFS recently authorized a stock repurchase program of up to $15 million, a signal of management's confidence in the bank's intrinsic value.

Introduction

Regional banks remain a focal point for investors seeking exposure to Main Street economic activity without the complexity of money-center institutions. Citizens Financial Services, Inc. (CZFS) and Peoples Financial Services Corp. (PFIS) are two community-oriented bank holding companies, both headquartered in Pennsylvania and listed on the NASDAQ. While they share similar geographic footprints and industry classifications, their diverging scale, valuation metrics, and recent stock trajectories present a compelling head-to-head comparison. This article examines how these two regional banking stocks stack up across key dimensions, offering clarity for traders and investors evaluating opportunity within the regional banking sector.

CZFS Overview and Recent Performance

Citizens Financial Services, Inc. (CZFS) is a bank holding company conducting business through its wholly-owned subsidiary, First Citizens Community Bank (FCCB). Headquartered in Mansfield, Pennsylvania, the company operates 44 branches across Pennsylvania, Delaware, New Jersey, and New York, managing approximately $3.1 billion in assets. Its service offerings span traditional banking products—checking, savings, time deposits, and a broad loan portfolio covering residential, commercial, agricultural, and consumer lending—alongside trust administration, investment management, and brokerage services.

In recent weeks, CZFS has demonstrated notable upward price movement, trading near the top of its 52-week range. The stock has rallied from levels around $55–$57 at the start of 2026 to approximately $76 in late July, representing a year-to-date gain of roughly 33%. Catalyst events contributing to this momentum include the company's February 2026 announcement of a stock repurchase program authorizing the buyback of up to 200,000 shares at an aggregate purchase price not to exceed $15 million—a clear signal of management's confidence. The company's earnings performance in recent quarters has also exceeded consensus estimates, supporting the positive sentiment. With a P/E ratio around 9.1 and an EPS (earnings per share) trailing twelve months of approximately $8.19, CZFS presents a relatively modest valuation within its peer group.

PFIS Overview and Recent Performance

Peoples Financial Services Corp. (PFIS) is a bank holding company operating through its subsidiary, Peoples Security Bank and Trust Company. Founded in 1905 and headquartered in Moosic, Pennsylvania, the company serves retail and commercial customers through 39 full-service community banking offices across Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York. Its product suite includes money market accounts, certificates of deposit, residential and commercial real estate loans, wealth management, fiduciary services, and brokerage offerings.

Recent market activity has been exceptionally strong for PFIS. The stock has surged approximately 44% year-to-date, climbing from around $48 at the beginning of 2026 to roughly $70 in late July—repeatedly setting new 52-week highs. The company's market capitalization has expanded to approximately $703 million, reflecting growing investor conviction. PFIS benefits from higher total revenues than CZFS, and its dividend of $0.625 per quarter yields approximately 3.6% on an annualized basis, making it attractive for income-focused investors. The stock's beta of 0.73 indicates lower volatility relative to the broader market, while its P/E ratio of approximately 12.0 reflects a premium valuation compared to some regional banking peers.

Trending AI Robots

In an era where quantitative models increasingly shape market outcomes, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers traders a curated view into the platform's most promising automated trading strategies. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across diverse market conditions. However, only the top-performing, most strategically aligned bots earn placement in the Trending AI Robots section, where they are evaluated on metrics such as win rate, risk-reward profile, and consistency of returns. These bots operate across various trading styles—including swing trading, day trading, and longer-term trend following—each tailored to different timeframes and risk appetites. For investors who want to explore data-driven trading without manually sifting through thousands of opportunities, the Trending AI Robots page provides a focused entry point worth reviewing.

Head-to-Head Comparison

While both CZFS and PFIS operate in the same industry and overlapping geography, their profiles diverge in ways that matter to investors. PFIS is the larger entity by market capitalization (roughly $703 million versus $370 million) and generates substantially higher total revenue. Its broader scale and deeper operational history—dating back to 1905—provide a sense of institutional longevity. CZFS, founded in 1984, is smaller but has demonstrated operational efficiency, with a higher ROE (return on equity) of approximately 12% versus PFIS at around 11.7%.

On valuation, CZFS appears more attractively priced on an earnings basis, with a P/E ratio near 9.1 compared to PFIS at 12.0, and a lower price-to-sales ratio. However, valuation alone does not tell the full story—PFIS has delivered substantially stronger price momentum in 2026, outpacing CZFS by roughly 11 percentage points year-to-date. Dividend-oriented investors may gravitate toward PFIS for its higher yield, while value-conscious traders may find CZFS more compelling. From a risk perspective, both stocks carry the inherent exposures of regional banks, including sensitivity to interest rate cycles, loan portfolio credit quality, and regional economic conditions in the Mid-Atlantic and Northeast markets.

Notably, the recent stock repurchase authorization by CZFS introduces a tangible capital-allocation catalyst that PFIS has not matched in recent months. Conversely, PFIS's larger market capitalization and higher trading volumes may appeal to investors who prioritize liquidity and institutional following.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable market data, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely lean toward PFIS in the current environment, primarily due to its superior trend momentum and stronger relative performance. The stock's consistent climb to repeated 52-week highs, combined with a higher market capitalization, robust dividend yield, and a beta of just 0.73—indicating lower-than-market volatility—presents a profile of steady, compounding strength. While CZFS offers compelling value on an earnings-multiple basis and a clear capital-return catalyst through its buyback program, the AI would likely assign greater probabilistic weight to the sustained upward trajectory that PFIS has demonstrated. That said, both stocks reside in the same cyclical sector, and relative positioning could shift rapidly with changes in interest rate expectations or regional economic data. The AI's assessment is probabilistic in nature, not a declaration of certainty, and reflects the current alignment of trend, stability, and catalyst factors.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CZFS vs. PFIS commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZFS is a Buy and PFIS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (CZFS: $77.52 vs. PFIS: $70.36)
Brand notoriety: CZFS and PFIS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CZFS: 113% vs. PFIS: 101%
Market capitalization -- CZFS: $372.82M vs. PFIS: $704.37M
CZFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $372.82M. PFIS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $704.37M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CZFS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePFIS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CZFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PFIS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CZFS is a better buy in the long-term than PFIS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CZFS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFIS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CZFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PFIS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CZFS is a better buy in the short-term than PFIS.

Price Growth

CZFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.53% price change this week, while PFIS (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

CZFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2026.

PFIS is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFIS($704M) has a higher market cap than CZFS($373M). PFIS has higher P/E ratio than CZFS: PFIS (12.45) vs CZFS (9.07). PFIS YTD gains are higher at: 47.607 vs. CZFS (38.140). CZFS has less debt than PFIS: CZFS (199M) vs PFIS (406M). PFIS has higher revenues than CZFS: PFIS (192M) vs CZFS (116M).
CZFSPFISCZFS / PFIS
Capitalization373M704M53%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD38.14047.60780%
P/E Ratio9.0712.4573%
Revenue116M192M60%
Total CashN/A58.4M-
Total Debt199M406M49%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CZFS vs PFIS: Fundamental Ratings
CZFS
PFIS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2750
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6024
SMR RATING
1..100
5954
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3939
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4895
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PFIS's Valuation (26) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CZFS (29) in the null industry. This means that PFIS’s stock grew similarly to CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

PFIS's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CZFS (60) in the null industry. This means that PFIS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

PFIS's SMR Rating (54) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CZFS (59) in the null industry. This means that PFIS’s stock grew similarly to CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

PFIS's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CZFS (39) in the null industry. This means that PFIS’s stock grew similarly to CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

CZFS's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PFIS (95) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CZFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than PFIS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CZFSPFIS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CZFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PFIS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TDEIX34.920.32
+0.92%
Transamerica US Growth I
AUUCX22.760.15
+0.66%
AB Select US Equity C
PAFDX44.940.18
+0.40%
T. Rowe Price Equity Income Advisor
NIQCX14.70-0.02
-0.14%
Neuberger International Eq C
SETAX16.96-0.10
-0.59%
SEI Real Estate F (SIMT)

CZFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZFS has been loosely correlated with BHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CZFS jumps, then BHB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CZFS
1D Price
Change %
CZFS100%
+1.49%
BHB - CZFS
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
OSBC - CZFS
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
HBT - CZFS
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
PFIS - CZFS
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.05%
CTBI - CZFS
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
More

PFIS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFIS has been closely correlated with SRCE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFIS jumps, then SRCE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFIS
1D Price
Change %
PFIS100%
-1.05%
SRCE - PFIS
83%
Closely correlated
N/A
THFF - PFIS
83%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
IBCP - PFIS
82%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
MBWM - PFIS
82%
Closely correlated
+0.59%
PRK - PFIS
81%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
More