CZFS
Price
$85.82Alerts
Change
-$0.52 (-0.60%)
Updated
Nov 11 closing price
Capitalization
408.21M
85 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PFIS
Price
$72.44Alerts
Change
-$0.14 (-0.19%)
Updated
Nov 11 closing price
Capitalization
723.15M
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CZFS vs PFIS

CZFS vs PFIS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 20, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Citizens Financial Services (CZFS) vs. Peoples Financial Services Corp. (PFIS) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • CZFS and PFIS are both Pennsylvania-based community bank holding companies, but PFIS is the larger institution by market capitalization and total assets.
  • Both stocks have delivered strong relative performance, with year-to-date gains near 39% each, outperforming the broader market by a wide margin.
  • CZFS trades at a lower valuation (roughly 9x trailing earnings) and has posted four consecutive earnings beats, signaling consistent execution.
  • PFIS offers a higher dividend yield (about 3.7%) and stronger scale after its FNCB Bancorp integration but carries a higher beta and a higher earnings multiple.
  • Both names have pulled back modestly in recent weeks after extended rallies, making relative momentum and stability key differentiators.

Introduction

Community and regional banks have been a focal point for traders and investors tracking interest-rate expectations, credit quality, and merger-driven consolidation. This stock comparison examines two northeastern Pennsylvania bank holding companies, Citizens Financial Services and Peoples Financial Services Corp., to assess how they differ in market positioning, relative performance, and risk. Investors evaluating smaller-cap financials — including those focused on dividend income, value, or momentum — may find this side-by-side useful for understanding where each name currently stands. While the two institutions share geographic roots and a common industry, their scale, valuation, and recent earnings trajectories point to distinct trade-offs worth weighing.

CZFS Overview and Recent Performance

Citizens Financial Services, Inc. (CZFS) is a bank holding company founded in 1984 and headquartered in Mansfield, Pennsylvania, operating as a community bank across its regional footprint. The stock has been among the stronger performers in the Northeast banking group, rising roughly 39% year to date and advancing more than 40% over the trailing twelve months, well ahead of the broader market.

Recent market activity has reflected a sustained upward trend punctuated by a pullback from 52-week highs in recent weeks. A key driver has been earnings consistency: the company has beaten consensus earnings-per-share estimates in each of its last four quarters, including a first-quarter 2026 result of $2.16 per share against expectations near $1.98. This execution has supported positive estimate revisions and contributed to a comparatively low valuation of about 9x trailing earnings and a price-to-book ratio near 1.1, alongside a dividend yield of roughly 2.6%. A low beta of approximately 0.4 indicates the shares have been notably less volatile than the market.

PFIS Overview and Recent Performance

Peoples Financial Services Corp. (PFIS) is a bank holding company based in Moosic, Pennsylvania, that provides commercial and retail banking through its wholly owned subsidiary, Peoples Security Bank and Trust Company. Following its completed merger with FNCB Bancorp, the institution operates a broader multi-state footprint across Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, with total assets in the multi-billion-dollar range.

The shares have also posted strong gains, climbing roughly 39% year to date and more than 45% over the past year. Recent weeks have brought a modest consolidation after the stock approached its 52-week high. The company's recent reporting has shown improving asset quality — with non-performing loans near 0.28% of loans — and a net interest margin (the spread between interest earned on loans and interest paid on deposits) around 3.67%. However, a recent quarterly earnings report came in slightly below consensus. PFIS carries a higher beta near 0.74 and a trailing multiple above 12x earnings, while offering a larger dividend yield of roughly 3.7%.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron operates hundreds of AI trading bots that monitor and trade thousands of different tickers across varying styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics. Because market conditions are constantly shifting, only a select group of the best-performing and most suitable bots is featured in the curated Trending AI Robots section. These bots span a range of approaches — from short-term momentum and swing strategies to longer-horizon trend-following models — and each manages its own set of tickers and risk parameters. The curated list is designed to help traders identify the bots currently aligned with prevailing market dynamics rather than sifting through the full catalog. Exploring the Trending AI Robots page can offer a practical starting point for those interested in automated, data-driven trading strategies.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The clearest contrast between the two names is scale. PFIS is the larger enterprise, with a market capitalization around $700 million and an expanded branch network following its FNCB Bancorp integration, whereas CZFS is a smaller institution valued near $380 million. That size difference shows up in liquidity and volatility, with PFIS posting a higher beta and greater average trading volume.

On valuation and profitability, the two diverge further. CZFS trades at a lower earnings multiple and price-to-book ratio, while generating a higher return on equity (about 12.3% versus 11%) and return on assets (about 1.33% versus 1.08%). PFIS, by contrast, compensates investors with a more substantial dividend yield and benefits from a larger, more diversified asset base.

Recent momentum has been broadly similar, but the earnings record leans toward CZFS, which has repeatedly beaten estimates, while PFIS has delivered a recent slight miss. Risk factors also differ in emphasis: CZFS carries meaningful debt relative to its equity and a narrower geographic concentration, while PFIS faces ongoing post-merger integration considerations and a higher sensitivity to broader market swings. In short, CZFS skews toward value and efficiency, while PFIS skews toward scale and income.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including trend consistency, stability, valuation, and earnings momentum, Tickeron's AI would likely view CZFS as the comparatively stronger candidate in the current environment. The stock's lower volatility (beta near 0.4), consistent earnings beats, favorable valuation, and higher profitability metrics suggest a steadier trend profile and more resilient relative positioning. That said, this is a probabilistic assessment rather than a definitive outcome: PFIS offers advantages in scale, diversification, and dividend income that may appeal to a different type of investor. In a data-driven evaluation prioritizing trend quality and efficiency, the edge currently appears to rest with CZFS, though the relative picture could shift as new earnings and interest-rate data emerge.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CZFS vs. PFIS commentary
Nov 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CZFS is a Buy and PFIS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for CZFS with price predictions
Nov 10, 2026

CZFS in upward trend: price rose above 50-day moving average on October 21, 2026

CZFS moved above its 50-day moving average on October 21, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend. In 35 of 45 similar past instances, the stock price increased further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 78%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 20, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on CZFS as a result. In 70 of 94 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for CZFS just turned positive on October 19, 2026. Looking at past instances where CZFS's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 33 of 47 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 70%.

The 10-day moving average for CZFS crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 26, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 11 of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.

Following a +1.73% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CZFS advanced for three days, in 190 of 273 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 70%.

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 185 of 279 cases where CZFS Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 66%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The 10-day RSI Indicator for CZFS moved out of overbought territory on November 05, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 35 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 26 of the 35 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 74%.

The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 36 of 62 cases where CZFS's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 58%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CZFS declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 65%.

CZFS broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 21, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 20 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 39 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. CZFS’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 39 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly weaker than average sales and a marginally profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 46 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.157) is normal, around the industry mean (1.262). P/E Ratio (9.915) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.480). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.210) is also within normal values, averaging (1.194). Dividend Yield (0.024) settles around the average of (0.035) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.320) is also within normal values, averaging (3.740).

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 46 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 56, placing this stock slightly better than average.

The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for PFIS with price predictions
Nov 10, 2026

PFIS's RSI Indicator peaks and leaves overbought zone

The 10-day RSI Oscillator for PFIS moved out of overbought territory on November 03, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. Traders may want to look at selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 37 instances where the indicator moved out of the overbought zone. In 28 of the 37 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a move down at 76%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 32 of 59 cases where PFIS's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 54%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PFIS declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 59%.

PFIS broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 02, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 21, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on PFIS as a result. In 57 of 96 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 59%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for PFIS just turned positive on October 20, 2026. Looking at past instances where PFIS's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 26 of 44 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 59%.

PFIS moved above its 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.

The 10-day moving average for PFIS crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 28, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 10 of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 62%.

Following a +0.69% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PFIS advanced for three days, in 176 of 292 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 60%.

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 154 of 265 cases where PFIS Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 58%.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 10 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 20 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 56, placing this stock better than average.

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 31 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 39 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. PFIS’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.349) is normal, around the industry mean (1.262). P/E Ratio (12.741) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.480). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.220) is also within normal values, averaging (1.194). Dividend Yield (0.035) settles around the average of (0.035) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.643) is also within normal values, averaging (3.740).

The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.

FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CZFS vs PFIS: Fundamental Ratings
CZFS
PFIS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4427
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4620
SMR RATING
1..100
3931
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3939
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2010
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CZFS's Valuation (46) in the null industry is in the same range as PFIS (50) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CZFS’s stock grew similarly to PFIS’s over the last 12 months.

PFIS's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CZFS (46) in the null industry. This means that PFIS’s stock grew similarly to CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

PFIS's SMR Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CZFS (39) in the null industry. This means that PFIS’s stock grew similarly to CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

PFIS's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CZFS (39) in the null industry. This means that PFIS’s stock grew similarly to CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

PFIS's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CZFS (20) in the null industry. This means that PFIS’s stock grew similarly to CZFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CZFSPFIS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 12, 2026
Stock price -- (CZFS: $86.34 vs. PFIS: $72.58)
Brand notoriety: CZFS and PFIS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CZFS: 77% vs. PFIS: 168%
Market capitalization -- CZFS: $408.21M vs. PFIS: $723.15M
CZFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $408.21M. PFIS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $723.15M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $147.87 to $173.74B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CZFS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while PFIS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CZFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PFIS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CZFS and PFIS are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CZFS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFIS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CZFS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PFIS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CZFS and PFIS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CZFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.07% price change this week, while PFIS (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

CZFS is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2027.

PFIS is expected to report earnings on Feb 01, 2027.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.23% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement

CZFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CZFS has been loosely correlated with CCBG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CZFS jumps, then CCBG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CZFS
1D Price
Change %
CZFS100%
+0.19%
CCBG - CZFS
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
CZNC - CZFS
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
AROW - CZFS
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.33%
BFST - CZFS
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.18%
PFIS - CZFS
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
More

PFIS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFIS has been closely correlated with CCNE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFIS jumps, then CCNE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFIS
1D Price
Change %
PFIS100%
-0.78%
CCNE - PFIS
85%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
SRCE - PFIS
84%
Closely correlated
-0.50%
CAC - PFIS
84%
Closely correlated
+0.10%
IBCP - PFIS
83%
Closely correlated
-0.95%
BFST - PFIS
82%
Closely correlated
-0.18%
More
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UNTY58.21-0.27
-0.46%
Unity Bancorp
GMM1.00-0.01
-0.50%
Global Mofy AI Limited
RRR49.46-0.39
-0.78%
Red Rock Resorts
EP2.42-0.02
-0.82%
Empire Petroleum Corp
CDE15.29-1.16
-7.05%
Coeur Mining