Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ARRFX vs FSMDX
ARRFX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts ARRFX vs FSMDX
AMG River Road Focused Absolute Value N
Price$14.46
Change+$0.06 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.54M
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$36.90
Change+$0.16 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.39B
ARRFX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ARRFX vs. FSMDX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARRFX is a StrongBuy and FSMDX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 43.4B vs. ARRFX (52.5M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than ARRFX: FSMDX (1.29) vs ARRFX (0.70). ARRFX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: ARRFX (10 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). ARRFX (1.26) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). ARRFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than ARRFX: FSMDX (0) vs ARRFX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.61 vs. ARRFX (-0.66). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 66.58 vs. ARRFX (26.21).
| ARRFX | FSMDX | ARRFX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.03 | 4,240% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.03 | 5,040% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.514 | 9.059 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.5M | 43.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 1.29 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.66 | 11.61 | -6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.66 | 40.92 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.21 | 66.58 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 137.52 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement