Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ARRFX vs FSMDX
ARRFX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts ARRFX vs FSMDX
AMG River Road Focused Absolute Value N
Price$13.94
Change+$0.04 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.65M
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$35.59
Change+$0.18 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.38B
ARRFX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ARRFX vs. FSMDX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARRFX is a Hold and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 42.4B vs. ARRFX (50.7M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than ARRFX: FSMDX (1.31) vs ARRFX (0.70). ARRFX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: ARRFX (10 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). ARRFX (1.26) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). ARRFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than ARRFX: FSMDX (0) vs ARRFX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.58 vs. ARRFX (-1.89). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 70.17 vs. ARRFX (28.70).
| ARRFX | FSMDX | ARRFX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.03 | 4,240% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.03 | 5,040% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.677 | 5.111 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.7M | 42.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 1.31 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.89 | 8.58 | -22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.51 | 45.92 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.70 | 70.17 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 117.56 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement