Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ARRFX vs FSMDX
ARRFX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts ARRFX vs FSMDX
AMG River Road Focused Absolute Value N
Price$14.12
Change+$0.03 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.54M
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$35.91
Change+$0.06 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.03B
ARRFX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ARRFX vs. FSMDX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARRFX is a Hold and FSMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45B vs. ARRFX (50.5M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than ARRFX: FSMDX (1.26) vs ARRFX (0.69). ARRFX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: ARRFX (10 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). ARRFX (1.26) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). ARRFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than ARRFX: FSMDX (0) vs ARRFX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.94 vs. ARRFX (-7.67). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 48.13 vs. ARRFX (14.70).
| ARRFX | FSMDX | ARRFX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.03 | 4,240% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.03 | 5,040% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.135 | 6.417 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.5M | 45B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 1.26 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.67 | 1.94 | -395% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.79 | 38.73 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.70 | 48.13 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.80 | 128.68 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement