Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ARRFX vs FSMDX
ARRFX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts ARRFX vs FSMDX
ARRFX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ARRFX vs. FSMDX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARRFX is a Hold and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. ARRFX (43.4M). ARRFX (0.76) and FSMDX (0.75) have matching dividends . ARRFX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: ARRFX (11 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). ARRFX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). ARRFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than ARRFX: FSMDX (0) vs ARRFX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. ARRFX (-12.49). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. ARRFX (-12.82).
| ARRFX | FSMDX | ARRFX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.03 | 4,240% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.03 | 5,000% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.049 | 13.837 | -29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.4M | 53.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.75 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.49 | 13.26 | -94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.85 | 56.18 | 7% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.82 | 40.31 | -32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.74 | 167.00 | 13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement