Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ARRFX vs FSMDX
ARRFX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts ARRFX vs FSMDX
ARRFX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ARRFX vs. FSMDX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARRFX is a Buy and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. ARRFX (43M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than ARRFX: FSMDX (0.99) vs ARRFX (0.81). ARRFX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: ARRFX (11 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). ARRFX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). ARRFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than ARRFX: FSMDX (0) vs ARRFX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.46 vs. ARRFX (-9.52). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.72 vs. ARRFX (-16.51).
| ARRFX | FSMDX | ARRFX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.03 | 4,240% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.03 | 5,000% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.181 | 11.996 | -60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43M | 51.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 0.99 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.52 | 22.46 | -42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.01 | 59.36 | 12% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.51 | 42.72 | -39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.59 | 166.70 | 15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers