It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ARW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCLMB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ARW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLMB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ARW (@Electronics Distributors) experienced а -6.85% price change this week, while CLMB (@Electronics Distributors) price change was -0.54% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics Distributors industry was -2.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.82%.
ARW is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.
CLMB is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
Electronics distributors are companies that are involved in distribution of one or more of the following: electronic components, computer products/ peripherals and software products & services. Several electronics distributors are also becoming the point of contact for technical/pre- & post-sale support in many cases, in an attempt to bolster their position in the market. Tariffs and/or cross-border trade barriers are some of the potential threats to the electronics supply chain, but that could also potentially lead to re-directing to markets where tariffs/restrictions are lower depending on demand. The industry is also vulnerable in the event of economic slowdowns. Arrow Electronics, Inc., SYNNEX Corporation and Versum Materials, Inc. are some of the major electronics distributors in the U.S.
ARW | CLMB | ARW / CLMB | |
Capitalization | 6.99B | 315M | 2,218% |
EBITDA | 1.67B | 20.3M | 8,246% |
Gain YTD | -6.356 | 123.760 | -5% |
P/E Ratio | 8.15 | 25.37 | 32% |
Revenue | 33.1B | 352M | 9,403% |
Total Cash | 218M | 36.3M | 601% |
Total Debt | 3.81B | 2.62M | 145,288% |
ARW | CLMB | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 65 Fair valued | 80 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 38 | 2 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 74 | 44 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 14 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ARW's Valuation (65) in the Electronics Distributors industry is in the same range as CLMB (80). This means that ARW’s stock grew similarly to CLMB’s over the last 12 months.
CLMB's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Electronics Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ARW (38). This means that CLMB’s stock grew somewhat faster than ARW’s over the last 12 months.
CLMB's SMR Rating (44) in the Electronics Distributors industry is in the same range as ARW (74). This means that CLMB’s stock grew similarly to ARW’s over the last 12 months.
CLMB's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Electronics Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ARW (77). This means that CLMB’s stock grew somewhat faster than ARW’s over the last 12 months.
CLMB's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Electronics Distributors industry is in the same range as ARW (16). This means that CLMB’s stock grew similarly to ARW’s over the last 12 months.
ARW | CLMB | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago60% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago60% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago59% | 2 days ago76% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago82% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | 2 days ago62% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | 2 days ago74% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago68% | 2 days ago75% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | 14 days ago61% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago55% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago76% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
SPHY | 23.75 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
SPDR® Portfolio High Yield Bond ETF | |||
DVYE | 27.22 | -0.06 | -0.22% |
iShares Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | |||
FEUZ | 41.02 | -0.13 | -0.31% |
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
IQSI | 28.89 | -0.21 | -0.71% |
NYLI Candriam International Equity ETF | |||
COPJ | 21.13 | -0.45 | -2.09% |
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARW has been closely correlated with AVT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ARW jumps, then AVT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ARW | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ARW | 100% | -1.50% | ||
AVT - ARW | 77% Closely correlated | -1.78% | ||
CNXN - ARW | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.83% | ||
SNX - ARW | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
NSIT - ARW | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.20% | ||
SCSC - ARW | 43% Loosely correlated | -3.01% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLMB has been loosely correlated with CNXN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLMB jumps, then CNXN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLMB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CLMB | 100% | +0.35% | ||
CNXN - CLMB | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.83% | ||
SCSC - CLMB | 41% Loosely correlated | -3.01% | ||
AVT - CLMB | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.78% | ||
SNX - CLMB | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
ARW - CLMB | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.50% | ||
More |