Advertisement
ARW vs CNXN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARW is a Hold and CNXN is a StrongBuy.
ARW | CNXN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 84 | 88 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 70 Overvalued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 63 | 68 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 32 | 20 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ARW's Valuation (70) in the Electronics Distributors industry is in the same range as CNXN (84) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ARW’s stock grew similarly to CNXN’s over the last 12 months.
CNXN's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as ARW (20) in the Electronics Distributors industry. This means that CNXN’s stock grew similarly to ARW’s over the last 12 months.
ARW's SMR Rating (63) in the Electronics Distributors industry is in the same range as CNXN (68) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ARW’s stock grew similarly to CNXN’s over the last 12 months.
ARW's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Electronics Distributors industry is in the same range as CNXN (37) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ARW’s stock grew similarly to CNXN’s over the last 12 months.
CNXN's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as ARW (32) in the Electronics Distributors industry. This means that CNXN’s stock grew similarly to ARW’s over the last 12 months.
| ARW | CNXN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 46% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 64% | 9 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 58% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ARW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while CNXN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- ARW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- CNXN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ARW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CNXN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ARW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- CNXN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ARW (@Electronics/Appliance Stores) experienced а -2.11% price change this week, while CNXN (@Electronics/Appliance Stores) price change was -1.81% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliance Stores industry was -5.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +45.17%.
Reported Earning Dates
ARW is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
CNXN is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronics/Appliance Stores (-5.99% weekly)The electronics/appliance stores industry includes companies that sell consumer electronics such as computers, stereo components, software, TVs, and appliances such as those for cooking and cleaning. Some companies also operate stores that rent and sell pre-recorded CDs and DVDs. Best Buy Co., Inc., Conn’s, Inc., Sears Hometown and Outlet Stores Inc. and Trans World Entertainment Corp. are some of the largest companies in this space.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DEUS | 64.66 | 0.61 | +0.95% |
| Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS) | |||
| YFFI | 9.54 | 0.04 | +0.39% |
| Indexperts Yield Focused Fixed Income ETF (YFFI) | |||
| HBR | 9.57 | N/A | N/A |
| CANARY CAPITAL GROUP | |||
| HONG | 12.08 | N/A | N/A |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long HON Daily ETF (HONG) | |||
| JHML | 90.51 | -0.10 | -0.11% |
| John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) | |||
ARW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARW has been loosely correlated with SNX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ARW jumps, then SNX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ARW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARW | 100% | -2.26% | ||
| SNX - ARW | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.50% | ||
| CIIT - ARW | 11% Poorly correlated | +19.09% | ||
| CLMB - ARW | 2% Poorly correlated | -0.49% | ||
| AVT - ARW | -2% Poorly correlated | -2.90% | ||
| NSIT - ARW | -2% Poorly correlated | +0.77% | ||
More | ||||
CNXN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNXN has been loosely correlated with AVT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNXN jumps, then AVT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CNXN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNXN | 100% | -1.19% | ||
| AVT - CNXN | 54% Loosely correlated | -2.90% | ||
| NSIT - CNXN | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| SCSC - CNXN | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.87% | ||
| SNX - CNXN | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.50% | ||
| ARW - CNXN | 36% Loosely correlated | -2.26% | ||
More | ||||